Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jun 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Haines
18 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Dunn
4 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Dunn
17 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Haines
19 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Sep 2019 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement