Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included IPD-NMAs

From: Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study

Items

Frequency

Proportion (%)

Publication year

 2007

1

4.8

 2010

1

4.8

 2011

1

4.8

 2012

5

23.8

 2013

1

4.8

 2014

4

19.0

 2015

2

9.5

 2017

3

14.3

 2018

2

9.5

 2019

1

4.8

Country of the correspondence author

 USA

9

42.9

 UK

7

33.3

 France

3

14.3

 Cameroon

1

4.8

 Netherland

1

4.8

Journal impact factor

 0.0 to 3.0

6

28.6

 3.1 to 6.0

5

23.8

 6.1 to 15.0

2

9.5

 > 15.0

6

28.6

 Non-SCI

2

9.5

Number of authors

 1 to 3 authors

0

0

 4 to 6 authors

8

38.1

 7 to 10 authors

5

23.8

 11 or more authors

8

38.1

With statistician or epidemiologist

7

33.3

Authors from 2 or more countries

15

71.4

With a priori protocol

6

28.6

Format of data

 IPD only

11

52.4

 IPD + AD

10

47.6

Number of RCTs included: median (IQR)

19 (9, 26)

 

Number of samples included: median (IQR)

7110 (4906.5, 14261)

 

Number of interventions included: median (IQR)

6 (4,7)

 

Funding sources

 Industry

6

28.6

 Non-industry

11

52.4

 Industry + non-industry

3

14.3

 Unfunded

1

4.8

  1. SCI science citation index, IPD individual participant data, AD aggregate data, IQR interquartile range