Epigenetic tuning of brain signal entropy in emergent human social behavior

Table 1 ERP replication results

		ANOVA	Crying vs. neutral	Crying vs. laughing	Laughing vs. neutral
Processed data	N2	F(2,138) = 4.43, p = .014	t(69) = − 2.74, p = .008	t(69) = − 2.72, p = .008	t(69) = 0.05, p = .960
	P3	F(2,138) = 16.14, p < .001	t(69) = 0.85, p = .396	t(69) = − 4.93, p < .001	t(69) = 4.66, p < .001
	LP	F(2,138) = 4.55, p = .012	t(69) = 2.13, p = .037	t(69) = − 0.95, p = .346	t(69) = 2.88, p = .005
Rejected ICA components	N2	F(2,138) = 0.91, p = .406	t(69) = 1.28, p = .206	t(69) = 0.7, p = .485	t(69) = 0.69, p = .495
	P3	F(2,138) = 2.21, p = .113	t(69) = 1.9, p = .062	t(69) = 0.98, p = .329	t(69) = 1.3, p = .197
	LP	F(2,138) = 0.72, p = .489	t(69) = 0.92, p = .360	t(69) = 1.02, p = .310	t(69) = 0.22, p = .826

Processed data: ANOVA results replicating ERP N2, P3, and LP effects reported in the original study by Missana et al. [60] using the novel preprocessing steps taken in this secondary data analysis in study 1. Rejected ICA components: We find no significant differences across conditions in the ICA components rejected during preprocessing, suggesting these data were correctly rejected as artifacts

ISSN: 1741-7015