Skip to main content

Table 2 The relationship between the Δnode-Δnetwork association and the assessed node metrics for networks based on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale and the PTSD Checklist with or without the “amnesia” item. p values were adjusted for multiple testing

From: On the validity of the centrality hypothesis in cross-sectional between-subject networks of psychopathology

Questionnaire

Metric

All symptoms included

Amnesia excluded

r (15)

95% CI

p

r (14)

95% CI

p

CAPS

Strength

.239

[−.273, .646]

.513

−.085

[−.557, .429]

.885

EI

.641

[.231, .857]

.013

.246

[−.285, .661]

.513

Predictability

.435

[−.057, .758]

.135

−.051

[−.553, .456]

.885

Mean severity

.870

[.669, .952]

.004

.727

[.362, .889]

.004

Infrequency

−.857

[−.947, −.639]

.004

−.690

[−.884, −.296]

.010

PCL

Strength

.038

[−.451, .509]

.885

−.097

[−.566, .418]

.885

EI

.653

[.251, .863]

.011

.186

[−.341, .624]

.805

Predictability

.449

[−.041, .764]

.129

−.040

[−.525, .465]

.885

Mean severity

.844

[.612, .943]

.004

.659

[.250, .870]

.012

Infrequency†1

−.843

[−.941, −.610]

.004

−.609

[−.848, −.162]

.024

  1. Note. r Pearson correlation coefficient, CAPS Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, PCL PTSD Checklist, EI expected influence; Infrequency = infrequency of endorsement, † = significant correlation between item variance and centrality measure, 1 = only in the network without “Amnesia”