Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean scores for additional statements regarding intention to undergo colonoscopy (maximum = 7)

From: The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial

 

Numerical risk arm (mean score out of 7, (95% CI))

Categorical risk arm (mean score out of 7, (95% CI))

Positive result letter arm (mean score out of 7, (95% CI))

p value

“If I received information that my risk of bowel cancer was 1 in x then I would intend to have a colonoscopy”

 1 in 40/highest risk/positive result letter

6.4 (6.1–6.6)

6.7 (6.5–6.8)

6.5 (6.3–6.7)

0.085

 1 in 1600/moderate risk

5.4 (5.1–5.8)

6.4 (6.2–6.6)

< 0.0001

 1 in 3500/lowest risk

5.0 (4.7–5.4)

5.3 (4.9–5.6)

0.3484

“If I was told that I had a 1 in x chance of having bowel cancer, I would definitely intend to have a colonoscopy”

 1 in 40/highest risk/positive result letter

6.5 (6.3–6.7)

6.7 (6.6–6.9)

6.7 (6.6–6.9)

0.124

 1 in 1600/moderate risk

5.6 (5.2–5.9)

6.4 (6.2–6.6)

< 0.0001

 1 in 3500/lowest risk

5.0 (4.7–5.4)

5.1 (4.7–5.6)

0.6568

  1. Scoring system: “strongly disagree” = 1, “disagree” = 2, “slightly disagree” = 3, “neither agree or disagree” = 4, “slightly agree” = 5, “agree” = 6, “strongly agree” = 7