Skip to main content

Table 3 Cesarean section rates by obstetric characteristics according to the modified Robson classification by group allocation and period, Shanghai, China

From: A cluster-randomized field trial to reduce cesarean section rates with a multifaceted intervention in Shanghai, China

 

Intervention group (10 hospitals)

Control group (10 hospitals)

Effect estimates

Cesarean by indications (modified Robson classification)

Baseline (N = 5498)

Evaluation (N = 5092)

Rate change%

Baseline (N = 5254)

Evaluation (N = 5429)

Rate change%

Adjusted OR (95%CI)

p value

1. Nulliparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, spontaneous labor

 Total no.

1586

1100

 

1619

1259

   

 Cs, no.(%)

129 (8.1)

89 (8.1)

0

160 (9.9)

101 (8.0)

−1.9

1.24 (0.71, 2.17)

0.44

2. Nulliparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, induced labor

 Total no.

717

761

 

660

805

   

 Cs, no.(%)

160 (22.3)

132 (17.4)

−4.9

141 (21.4)

148 (18.4)

−3.0

0.87 (0.52, 1.46)

0.60

3. Nulliparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, CS before labor

 Total no.

819

650

 

762

714

   

 Cs, no.(%)

819 (100)

650 (100)

0

762 (100)

714 (100)

0

NA

NA

4. Multiparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, without a previous CS, spontaneous labor

 Total no.

796

764

 

753

886

   

 Cs, no.(%)

22 (2.8)

11 (1.4)

−1.4

13 (1.7)

10 (1.1)

−0.6

0.85 (0.27, 2.72)

0.78**

5. Multiparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, without a previous CS, induced labor

 Total no.

159

329

 

166

294

   

 Cs, no.(%)

11 (6.9)

21 (6.4)

−0.5

11 (6.6)

14 (4.8)

−1.8

1.03 (0.32, 3.35)

0.96**

6. Multiparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, without a previous CS, CS before labor

 Total no.

97

103

 

96

136

   

 Cs, no.(%)

97 (100)

103 (100)

0

96 (100)

136 (100)

0

NA

NA

7. Multiparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥ 37 weeks, with a previous CS

 Total no.

688

853

 

664

842

   

 Cs, no.(%)

666 (96.8)

827 (97.0)

0.2

631 (95.0)

818 (97.2)

2.2

0.52 (0.21, 1.29)

0.15**

8. Singleton, breech, transverse or oblique lie#

 Total no.

284

230

 

222

206

   

 Cs, no.(%)

237 (83.5)

202 (87.8)

4.3

213 (96.0)

197 (95.6)

−0.4

2.05 (0.4, 10.65)

0.39

9. Multiple pregnancy (twins or higher-order multiples)

 Total no.

113

90

 

66

64

   

 Cs, no.(%)

108 (95.6)

84 (93.3)

−2.3

58 (87.9)

59 (92.2)

4.3

0.25 (0.02, 3.25)

0.28**

10. Singleton, cephalic, < 37 weeks

 Total no.

217

201

 

231

217

   

 Cs, no.(%)

80 (36.9)

88 (43.8)

6.9

91 (39.4)

107 (49.3)

9.9

0.7 (0.34, 1.43)

0.32

99. Unknown

 Total no.

22

11

 

15

6

   

 Cs, no.(%)

7 (31.8)

2 (18.2)

−13.6

5 (33.3)

1 (16.7)

−16.6

NA

NA

  1. **A logistic model was used because the calculations for the GEE model did not converge. For this model, p values of less than 0.001 were considered to indicate statistical significance and p values of less than 0.003 were considered to indicate marginal significance
  2. #The number of subjects in transverse or oblique lie was small while the CS rates for non-cephalic presentations were very high; thus, these groups were combined into one
  3. Abbreviation: NA not applicable