From: Optimizing antiviral treatment for seasonal influenza in the USA: a mathematical modeling analysis
Outcome | Texas | California | Connecticut | Virginia | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model projection (#) | Proportion2 (%) | Model projection (#) | Proportion2 (%) | Model projection (#) | Proportion2 (%) | Model projection (#) | Proportion2 (%) | |
Hospitalizations averted annually compared to baseline scenario: 1 | ||||||||
 Treating early3 while keeping baseline treatment coverage | 205–718 | (2.4–8.6) | 311–1067 | (2.4–8.9) | 25–82 | (3.0–10.6) | 61–199 | (2.9–10.1) |
 Treating 20% of infected individuals early3 | 397–1414 | (4.5–16.8) | 596–2083 | (4.6–17.1) | 49–157 | (5.8–20.3) | 116–383 | (5.5–19.4) |