Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (with corresponding 95% CIs and p values) for DR and STDR given QOF exposures after 1:1 propensity score matching, as well as adjusted sample sizes after propensity score matching (N) with corresponding outcome events by exposure group

From: Associations between attainment of incentivised primary care indicators and incident diabetic retinopathy in England: a population-based historical cohort study

   

Outcome events

Unadjusted analyses

Adjusted analyses*

Outcome

Exposure (indicator met)

N

Exposed group

Unexposed group

HR

95% CI

p

HR

95% CI

p

Retinopathy

HbA1c

37,182

2575

2897

0.87

0.83–0.92

< 0.0001

0.94

0.89–0.99

0.0300

Blood pressure

50,426

3291

3721

0.88

0.84–0.92

< 0.0001

0.87

0.83–0.92

< 0.0001

Cholesterol

30,978

2164

2018

1.01

0.95–1.08

0.6988

1.03

0.97–1.10

0.2918

All QOF indicators

40,220

2402

2773

0.84

0.80–0.89

< 0.0001

0.86

0.81–0.91

< 0.0001

Sight-threatening retinopathy

HbA1c

37,182

235

370

0.66

0.56–0.78

< 0.0001

0.74

0.62–0.87

0.0002

Blood pressure

50,426

296

400

0.79

0.68–0.92

0.0022

0.78

0.67–0.91

0.0015

Cholesterol

30,978

200

224

0.80

0.66–0.97

0.0249

0.82

0.67–0.99

0.0428

All QOF indicators

40,220

191

249

0.75

0.62–0.90

0.0023

0.77

0.64–0.93

0.0065

  1. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; QOF, Quality Outcomes Framework. *Adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivation, practice region, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, number of other co-morbid conditions, hospitalisations, duration of diabetes, diabetes complications, number of glucose-lowering therapies, and insulin prescription status