Skip to main content

Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (with corresponding 95% CIs and p values) for DR and STDR given NDA exposures after 1:1 propensity score matching, as well as adjusted sample sizes after propensity score matching (N) with corresponding outcome events by exposure group

From: Associations between attainment of incentivised primary care indicators and incident diabetic retinopathy in England: a population-based historical cohort study

   

Outcome events

Unadjusted analyses

Adjusted analyses*

Outcome

Exposure (processes completed)

N

Exposed group

Unexposed group

HR

95% CI

p

HR

95% CI

p

Retinopathy

4–6 (vs. 0–3)

5438

309

282

1.14

0.97–1.33

0.1165

1.16

0.98–1.36

0.0793

7–9 (vs. 0–3)

14,052

968

831

1.13

1.03–1.24

0.0097

1.07

0.98–1.18

0.1378

7–9 (vs. 4–6)

5484

395

289

1.15

0.98–1.34

0.0818

1.15

0.98–1.35

0.0942

9 (vs. < 9)

49,602

3874

3220

1.02

0.97–1.07

0.4477

1.03

0.99–1.08

0.1703

Sight-threatening retinopathy

4–6 (vs. 0–3)

5438

40

39

1.10

0.71–1.69

0.6834

1.14

0.73–1.78

0.5715

7–9 (vs. 0–3)

14,052

84

120

0.75

0.57–0.98

0.0325

0.72

0.55–0.94

0.0166

7–9 (vs. 4–6)

5484

39

39

1.07

0.70–1.63

0.7669

1.14

0.73–1.78

0.5720

9 (vs. < 9)

49,602

357

351

0.85

0.74–0.99

0.0372

0.88

0.76–1.03

0.1083

  1. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; *adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivation, practice region, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, number of other co-morbid conditions, hospitalisations, duration of diabetes, diabetes complications, number of glucose-lowering therapies, and insulin prescription status