Skip to main content

Table 6 Adherence to ABC pathway and outcomes according to clusters

From: Impact of clinical phenotypes on management and outcomes in European atrial fibrillation patients: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF (EORP-AF) General Long-Term Registry

  Composite outcome
HRa 95% CI P
Cluster 1
 ABC vs. Non-ABC 0.89 0.66–1.21 .45
 A Criterion 1.25 0.80–1.96 .34
 B Criterion 0.59 0.34–1.01 .06
 C Criterion 0.82 0.63–1.05 .12
Cluster 2
 ABC vs. Non-ABC 0.62 0.40–0.97 .04
 A Criterion 1.23 0.78–1.95 .38
 B Criterion 0.63 0.28–1.41 .26
 C Criterion 0.55 0.37–0.81 .002
Cluster 3
 ABC vs. Non-ABC 0.53 0.36–0.76 < .001
 A Criterion 1.14 0.38–3.38 .82
 B Criterion 0.96 0.57–1.62 .87
 C Criterion 0.71 0.54–0.93 .01
  1. Legend: aadjusted for type of AF, EHRA score, use of OAC. For acronyms, please see previous tables’ legends