Skip to main content

Table 6 Adherence to ABC pathway and outcomes according to clusters

From: Impact of clinical phenotypes on management and outcomes in European atrial fibrillation patients: a report from the ESC-EHRA EURObservational Research Programme in AF (EORP-AF) General Long-Term Registry

 

Composite outcome

HRa

95% CI

P

Cluster 1

 ABC vs. Non-ABC

0.89

0.66–1.21

.45

 A Criterion

1.25

0.80–1.96

.34

 B Criterion

0.59

0.34–1.01

.06

 C Criterion

0.82

0.63–1.05

.12

Cluster 2

 ABC vs. Non-ABC

0.62

0.40–0.97

.04

 A Criterion

1.23

0.78–1.95

.38

 B Criterion

0.63

0.28–1.41

.26

 C Criterion

0.55

0.37–0.81

.002

Cluster 3

 ABC vs. Non-ABC

0.53

0.36–0.76

< .001

 A Criterion

1.14

0.38–3.38

.82

 B Criterion

0.96

0.57–1.62

.87

 C Criterion

0.71

0.54–0.93

.01

  1. Legend: aadjusted for type of AF, EHRA score, use of OAC. For acronyms, please see previous tables’ legends
Back to article page

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us