Skip to main content

Table 3 Evidence from SRs or MAs of intervention studies for the association between different interventions for PEH and any health outcome

From: Homelessness and health-related outcomes: an umbrella review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials

Author, year

Considered health outcome

Active treatment/control treatment

Number of patients allocated to each treatment

No. of included studies per association

Random-effects

measure, ES (95% CIs)

Results

p value random effects

I2 (p value)

PIs (95 % CIs)

LS

AMSTAR-plus

Hyun et al., 2020 [224]

Depression

Psychological interventions/treatment as usual

236/224

5

SMD: − 0.24 (− 0.49–0.02)

Psychological interventions are more effectiver than treatment as usual

0.07

42.6% (0.2)

− 0.964–0.491

No

10

Hyun et al., 2020 [224]

Anxiety

Psychological interventions/treatment as usual

229/215

5

SMD: − 0.25 (− 0.51–0)

Psychological interventions are moe effective than treatment as usual

0.05

39.9% (0.28)

− 0.967–0.459

No

10

  1. CI confidence interval, ES effect size, LS largest study with significant effect, MA meta-analysis, PI prediction interval, RR risk ratio, SMD standardized mean difference, SR systematic review