Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariable analysis for the risk factors of EBV and CMV infections post-transplantation

From: Effect of sorafenib maintenance on Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus infections in patients with FLT3-ITD AML undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Parameters

EBV-DNAemia

EBV-associated disease

CMV-DNAemia

CMV-associated disease

Gender

P=0.679

P=0.125

P=0.385

P=0.844

 Female vs male

Patient age

P=0.687

P=0.881

P=0.137

P=0.694

 < 35 vs ≥ 35 years

EBV serostatus

P=0.067

P=0.502

--

--

 D−/R+ vs other

CMV serostatus

--

--

P=0.573

P=0.797

 D−/R+ vs other

CR status at transplant

P=0.163

P=1.000

*P=0.025

P=0.455

 ≥ CR2 vs CR1

ATG use in the conditioning#

*P<0.001

*P=0.036

*P<0.001

P=0.985

 ATG vs no ATG

Sorafenib pre-transplant

P=0.349

P=0.727

P=0.085

P=0.296

 Use vs no use

Sorafenib post-transplant

P=0.853

P=0.628

P=0.892

P=0.702

 Sorafenib vs control

aGVHD&

P=0.417

P=0.196

*P=0.004

*P=0.023

cGVHD&

P=0.891

P=0.190

P=0.248

P=0.120

  1. Abbreviations: EBV Epstein-Barr virus, D donor, R recipient, CMV cytomegalovirus, CR complete remission, CR2 second CR, CR1 first CR, ATG antithymocyte immunoglobulin; aGVHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; cGVHD, chronic GVHD. *P<0.05. #All patients undergoing haploidentical donor (HID)/HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants received ATG as GVHD prophylaxis, and none of those undergoing HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants received ATG as GVHD prophylaxis. Considering there was collinearity between transplant modality (HID/MUD vs MSD) and ATG use in the conditioning (ATG vs no ATG), we only included ATG use in the conditioning in the analysis of risk factors for EBV/CMV infections. &Time-dependent covariate