Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for 10% and 25% of participants with the highest risk
| Â | Driver | Ma Point | Ma Cox | Guo | Chen | Betes | Aleksandrova | Imperiale | Hong |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top 10% | |||||||||
 Sensitivity | 9.17 | 18.2 | 25.9 | 7.63 | 6.81 | 15.5 | 25.2 | 12.5 | 24.0 |
 Specificity | 96.1 | 92.1 | 90.1 | 96.3 | 96.5 | 94.7 | 90.1 | 92.7 | 90.1 |
 PPV (%) | 2.30 | 1.37 | 1.50 | 1.19 | 1.30 | 1.68 | 1.25 | 1.87 | 1.39 |
 NPV (%) | 99.0 | 99.5 | 99.5 | 99.4 | 99.4 | 99.5 | 99.6 | 99.0 | 99.5 |
Top 25% | |||||||||
 Sensitivity (%) | 36.8 | 38.7 | 52.7 | 40.1 | 38.7 | 35.5 | 51.8 | 32.7 | 48.7 |
 Specificity (%) | 76.9 | 80.7 | 75.2 | 76.9 | 77.2 | 84.0 | 75.1 | 78.6 | 75.1 |
 PPV (%) | 1.60 | 1.20 | 1.22 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 1.28 | 1.03 | 1.67 | 1.13 |
 NPV (%) | 99.2 | 99.5 | 99.6 | 99.5 | 99.5 | 99.6 | 99.7 | 99.0 | 99.6 |