Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes in CONSORT sub-items between preprint and peer-reviewed journal publication (n = 78)

From: Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials

Consort item

Reported, no change

Not reported, no change

Added

Removed

Not applicable

Section 6a

 Clear primary outcome

70 (90%)

3 (4%)

2 (3%)

3 (4%)

0 (0%)

 Variable of interest

69 (88%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

8 (10%)a

 How the outcome was assessed

62 (79%)

8 (10%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

8 (10%)a

 The analysis metric

70 (90%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

8 (10%)a

 The summary measure for each study group

58 (74%)

9 (12%)

3 (4%)

0 (0%)

8 (10%)a

 Time point of interest for analysis

63 (81%)

4 (5%)

2 (3%)

1 (1%)

8 (10%)a

 Who assessed the outcome

33 (42%)

32 (41%)

4 (5%)

1 (1%)

8 (10%)a

Sections 8a and 9

 Method of sequence generation

71 (91%)

4 (5%)

3 (4%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 Mechanism allocation concealment

51 (65%)

20 (26%)

6 (8%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

Section 11a/b

 Who was blinded

25 (32%)

6 (8%)

5 (6%)

0 (0%)

42 (54%)b

 How the blinding was performed

31 (40%)

4 (5%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

42 (54%)b

 Similarities of the characteristics of the interventions

18 (23%)

11 (14%)

4 (5%)

1 (1%)

44 (56%)b

Section 13 a/b

 Flow chart

66 (85%)

8 (10%)

4 (5%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 Participants randomized

75 (96%)

2 (3%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 Participants who received treatment

68 (88%)

8 (10%)

2 (3%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 Participants lost to follow-up

77 (99%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 Participants who discontinued intervention

51 (65%)

23 (29%)

3 (4%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

 Participants analyzed

76 (97%)

2 (3%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Section 17a

 Result

74 (95%)

2 (3%)

1 (1%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

 Difference in estimated effect

49 (63%)

24 (31%)

4 (5%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

 Precision of the estimated effect

48 (62%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

29 (36%)c

Section 19

 List of harms addressed

43 (55%)

29 (37%)

4 (5%)

2 (3%)

0 (0%)

 Mode of data collection

37 (47%)

31 (40%)

6 (8%)

4 (5%)

0 (0%)

 Time frame of surveillance

35 (45%)

33 (42%)

6 (8%)

4 (5%)

0 (0%)

 Person responsible making attribution

30 (38%)

39 (50%)

5 (6%)

4 (5%)

0 (0%)

 Participant withdrawals due to harm

32 (41%)

43 (55%)

1 (1%)

2 (3%)

0 (0%)

 Results of each harm type

67 (86%)

8 (10%)

2 (3%)

1 (1%)

0 (0%)

Section 23

 Registration number

75 (96%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3 (4%)

0 (0%)

  1. Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding
  2. aEight publications did not clearly specify the primary outcome (either in preprint or journal publication). Due to that the full assessment of CONSORT, section 6a was (items 2–7) was not possible
  3. bForty-two trials were unblinded and could not be assessed. Two additional trials did not use a placebo control and could not be assessed for the item similar characteristics of the intervention (CONSORT section 11a/b, item 3)
  4. cTwenty-nine trials did not present the difference in estimated effect measure (CONSORT section 17a, item 2). Precision was therefore not assessable for 29 trials (item 3)