Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | BMC Medicine

Fig. 5

From: SIRPα antibody combined with oncolytic virus OH2 protects against tumours by activating innate immunity and reprogramming the tumour immune microenvironment

Fig. 5

M-IHC and IHC staining of the anti-SIRPα antibody treatment model. A Representative M-IHC results of the OH2 combined anti-SIRPα antibody group, OH2 combined isotype, OH2 group, and control group with larger tumour volume sat the initial treatment. CD8, green, CD16, sky blue, F4/80, purple, CD86, orange, and CD206, red. Scale bar, 100μm. B Quantitative results of NK cell (CD16) staining in the OH2 combined anti-SIRPα antibody group, OH2 combined isotype, OH2 group, and control group. n=3 samples/group. C Quantitative result of M2 macrophage (F4/80+CD206+) staining in the OH2 combined anti-SIRPα antibody group, OH2 combined isotype, OH2 group, and control group. n=3 samples/group. D Quantitative results of M1 macrophage (F4/80+CD86+) staining in the OH2 combined anti-SIRPα antibody group, OH2 combined isotype, OH2 group, and control group. n=3 samples/group. E Quantitative results of CD8 T cell staining in the OH2 combined anti-SIRPα antibody group, OH2 combined Isotype, OH2 group, and control group. n=3 samples/group. F Representative IHC staining for CD8, CD16, F4/80, CD86, and CD206 of the OH2 combined anti-SIRPα antibody group, OH2 combined isotype group, OH2 group, and control group with larger tumour volumes at the initial treatment. Original magnification, ×200. n=5 samples/group. G Quantitative results of CD8, CD16, F4/80, CD86 and CD206 staining in the OH2 combined anti-SIRPα antibody group, OH2 combined isotype, OH2 group and control group. n=5 samples/group. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with multiple comparisons. ns, no significant differences, *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, ****, p<0.0001 (proportion represented the percentage of the cell to the total number of cells)

Back to article page