Skip to main content

Table 5 Participant baseline characteristics by attendance group and site

From: Implementation and delivery of group consultations for young people with diabetes in socioeconomically deprived, ethnically diverse settings

 

Participants

Age (years)

Age (years) at diagnosis

Male

Ethnic minority

In education

Employed

Living in highest deprivation quintile

English as first language

Type 1 diabetes

Technology use* in the last year

Previous group education

n

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Site A (All)

50

21 (2.7)

14 (6.9)

24 (48)

40 (80)

13 (26)

15 (30)

26 (52)

22 (44)

40 (80)

17 (34)

11 (22)

Site A attenders

23

21 (2.7)

11a (6.9)

11 (48)

20 (87)

7 (30)

9 (39)

11 (48)

9 (39)

20 (87)

10 (44)

9 (39)b

Site A non- attenders

27

21 (2.8)

16a (6.2)

13 (48)

20 (74)

6 (22)

6 (22)

15 (56)

13 (48)

20 (74)

7 (26)

2 (7) b

Site B (All)

23

20 (2.3)

11 (6.1)

10 (43)

18 (78)

9 (39)

10 (23)

4 (17)

15 (65)

19 (82)

5 (22)

7 (30)

Site B attenders

14

20 (2.3)

11 (4.8)

6 (43)

10 (71)

4 (29)

7 (50)

3 (21)

9 (64)

12 (86)

3 (21)

2 (14)

Site B non- attenders

9

21 (2.1)

11 (8.1)

4 (44)

8 (89)

5 (56)

3 (33)

1 (11)

6 (67)

7 (78)

2 (22)

5 (56)

  1. Comparisons between attendees and non-attendees at sites A and B use t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared for categorical variables
  2. *Technology use refers to the use of newer diabetes technologies, including flash glucose monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring, or insulin pump therapy. p values ≥ 0.05, except ap value = 0.033 when comparing age at diagnosis between participants who attended vs. non-attended clinics at site A and bp value = 0.053 when attendees vs. non-attendees at site A were compared