Skip to main content

Table 6 KEGG pathway analysis results with the five genes

From: Identification of genetic variants associated with diabetic kidney disease in multiple Korean cohorts via a genome-wide association study mega-analysis

KEGG ID

Pathway description

Counts in network

Strength

FDR

Matching proteins in the network

hsa04612

Antigen processing and presentation

2/63

2.09

0.011

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa04940

Type I diabetes mellitus

2/39

2.30

0.011

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa05320

Autoimmune thyroid disease

2/48

2.21

0.011

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa05330

Allograft rejection

2/34

2.36

0.011

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa05332

Graft-versus-host disease

2/36

2.34

0.011

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa05416

Viral myocarditis

2/55

2.15

0.011

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa04145

Phagosome

2/142

1.74

0.024

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa04514

Cell adhesion molecules

2/137

1.76

0.024

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa05169

Epstein-Barr virus infection

2/193

1.61

0.036

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

hsa05166

Human T cell leukemia virus 1 infection

2/211

1.57

0.039

HLA-DQA1, HLA-A

  1. This measure describes how large the enrichment effect is. This measure describes how large the enrichment effect is. It is the ratio between the number of proteins in the network that are annotated with a term and the number of proteins that we can expect to be annotated with this term in a random network of the same size
  2. KEGG Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, FDR false discovery rate, Strength Log10(observed/expected)