Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Autoantibodies against MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A are associated with increased risk of concomitant autoimmune diseases in celiac patients

  • Antonio López-Vázquez1,
  • Lourdes Mozo1,
  • Rebeca Alonso-Arias1,
  • Beatriz Suárez-Álvarez1,
  • José Ramón Vidal-Castiñeira1,
  • Eduardo Arranz2,
  • Umberto Volta3,
  • Carlos Bousoño5,
  • Marcos López-Hoyos6, 7,
  • Luís Rodrigo4 and
  • Carlos López-Larrea1, 7Email author
BMC Medicine201412:34

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-34

Received: 16 December 2013

Accepted: 23 January 2014

Published: 25 February 2014



Overexpression of autologous proteins can lead to the formation of autoantibodies and autoimmune diseases. MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MICA) is highly expressed in the enterocytes of patients with celiac disease, which arises in response to gluten. The aim of this study was to investigate anti-MICA antibody formation in patients with celiac disease and its association with other autoimmune processes.


We tested serum samples from 383 patients with celiac disease, obtained before they took up a gluten-free diet, 428 patients with diverse autoimmune diseases, and 200 controls for anti-MICA antibodies. All samples were also tested for anti-endomysium and anti-transglutaminase antibodies.


Antibodies against MICA were detected in samples from 41.7% of patients with celiac disease but in only 3.5% of those from controls (P <0.0001) and 8.2% from patients with autoimmune disease (P <0.0001). These antibodies disappeared after the instauration of a gluten-free diet. Anti-MICA antibodies were significantly prevalent in younger patients (P <0.01). Fifty-eight patients with celiac disease (15.1%) presented a concomitant autoimmune disease. Anti-MICA-positive patients had a higher risk of autoimmune disease than MICA antibody-negative patients (P <0.0001; odds ratio = 6.11). The risk was even higher when we also controlled for age (odds ratio = 11.69). Finally, we found that the associated risk of developing additional autoimmune diseases was 16 and 10 times as high in pediatric patients and adults with anti-MICA, respectively, as in those without.


The development of anti-MICA antibodies could be related to a gluten-containing diet, and seems to be involved in the development of autoimmune diseases in patients with celiac disease, especially younger ones.


Autoantibodies Autoimmune diseases Celiac disease MICA NKG2D Type 1 diabetes mellitus


Celiac disease (CD) was previously considered a relatively rare pathology that appeared only in childhood, but is now recognized as being a very common disease that can be diagnosed at any age [1, 2]. Its most typical characteristics are a strong genetic association with the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles DQ2 and DQ8 [3, 4] and its triggering by an environmental factor, the intake of gluten. The soluble fraction of gliadin has been identified as the cause of this intolerance, but many other gluten proteins can be toxic in CD [5]. These proteins induce an inflammatory process in the intestine of susceptible people, but inflammation regresses after elimination of gluten-containing foods from the diet, leading to the recovery of the structure and function of the mucosa [3].

Autoantibodies, especially those directed against the tissue transglutaminase (tTG) enzyme, commonly appear in CD [6]. These antibodies are very important in the diagnosis of CD, but their role in the pathogenesis of the disease remains controversial [7]. Several studies have suggested that these antibodies are directly involved in the pathogenesis of CD. Zanoni et al. demonstrated the role of anti-TG2 antibodies in gut mucosal damage in patients with CD [8]. Their study showed that these antibodies are able to recognize an epitope that is common to TG2 and the Toll-like receptor 4. This interaction leads to the activation of the Toll-like receptor 4 pathway, an important initiator of innate immunity. Other studies have shown that anti-tTG antibodies may play an important role in epithelial cell proliferation [9] and interfere with intestinal epithelial cell adhesion [10]. Additionally, these autoantibodies disturb angiogenesis and modulate vascular permeability in vitro[11, 12]. Taken together, these observations suggest that future approaches to the study of CD should take the role of humoral immunity into account.

Other mechanisms, such as the MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MICA)- Natural killer group 2, member D (NKG2D) interaction, are directly involved in the pathogenesis of the disease [13]. MICA and MICB show homology with classical HLA-class I, but have no role in antigen presentation. MICA and MICB are cell surface glycoproteins that are constitutively expressed in enterocytes [14]. These proteins are ligands for the killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily K member 1, also known as NKG2D, which is an activating receptor that is mainly expressed in natural killer, CD8+ and γδT cells [15]. The MICA-NKG2D interaction in natural killer cells induces their cytolytic capacity, while in CD8+ T cells it acts as a co-stimulatory signal and complements antigen recognition by the T cell receptor [16]. MICA is strongly expressed in the enterocytes of patients with CD in response to the indirect toxic effect of gluten [17]. Furthermore, MICA binds the NKG2D receptor expressed on CD8+ intraepithelial lymphocytes and activates these T cells. This activation causes damage to the enterocytes, and could be the initiating event that ultimately leads to villous atrophy.

The tissue damage and increased expression of MICA may also induce the development of antibodies against this molecule. In fact, anti-MICA autoantibodies have been described in early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [18]. Moreover, these antibodies have been implicated in organ rejection in patients with renal [1921] and cardiac transplants [22, 23].

To test the hypothesis that the CD-related changes in gut mucosa may be associated with the development of antibodies against MICA, we investigated the presence of these antibodies in sera obtained from patients with active CD. We also considered the possibility that these antibodies play a role in the development of the additional autoimmune diseases (ADs) customarily associated with CD [24].


Study participants

A group of 383 patients diagnosed with CD (241 females, 142 males; mean age at diagnosis 22 ±21.96 years) by the Gastroenterology and Paediatric Departments of two Spanish and one Italian hospital between 2002 and 2012 were selected for this study. The diagnosis of CD was made in accordance with the revised criteria of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition [25, 26] and World Gastroenterology Organisation guidelines [27, 28] In addition to clinical features, all patients were positive for anti- tTG and/or anti-endomysium antibodies. They also presented with a variable degree of intestinal mucosal damage (Marsh I to Marsh IIIc), before starting a gluten-free diet (GFD). A second serum sample was obtained from all patients after at least one year on a GFD. These samples were analyzed to establish treatment compliance and to assess the influence of a GFD on titers of anti-MICA antibodies.

All patients were typed for HLA-DQA1* and HLA-DQB1* alleles. Similar to the prevalence noted in Caucasian populations [29], 88% of the patients were HLA-DQ2+ and 11% were HLA-DQ8+. The clinical features of the patients are illustrated in Table 1. Additionally, the various ADs detected in these patients are listed in Table 2.
Table 1

Clinical and analytical features of patients and healthy controls


Patients with celiac disease

Patients with autoimmune disease

Healthy controls n = 200


n = 383

n = 428


Gender (female/male)




Mean age (SD)

22 (21.76)

39 (23.04)

23 (18.74)



Marsh I

7 (1.8%)



Marsh II

32 (8.3%)



Marsh IIIa

63 (16.4%)



Marsh IIIb

70 (18.3%)



Marsh IIIc

211 (55.1%)




338 (89.2%)b

182 (42%)

44 (22%)


42 (11.0%)

152 (35%)

18 (9%)

HLA-DQ2 and DQ8-negative

14 (3.6%)

136 (31.8%)

138 (69%)

Autoimmune diseases

58 (15.1%)

428 (100%)


aIncludes DQ2-DQ8-positive patients; b P <0000.1; odds ratio = 24.19; 95% confidence interval = 15.815, 36.997.

Table 2

Autoimmune diseases in patients with and without celiac disease


With celiac disease

Without celiac disease


n = 58

n = 428

Type 1 diabetes

22 (37.9%)

106 (24.8%)

Autoimmune thyroiditis

9 (15.5%)

47 (11.0%)

Systemic lupus erythematosus

7 (12.1%)

92 (21.5%)

Rheumatoid arthritis

6 (10.3%)

51 (11.9%)

Pernicious anemia

3 (5.2%)

22 (5.1%)

Primary biliary cirrhosis

3 (5.2%)

17 (4.0%)

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

1 (1.7%)

4 (1.0%)

Autoimmune hepatitis

3 (5.2%)

15 (3.5%)

Crohn’s disease

2 (3.4%)

40 (9.3%)

Ulcerative colitis


9 (2.1%)

Mixed connective tissue disease

1 (1.7%)

1 (0.2%)

Addison’s disease


3 (0.7%)

Sjögren’s syndrome

1 (1.7%)

21 (4.9%)

Another group of 428 patients (mean age 39 ± 3.04 years, 65.4% females) diagnosed for several ADs but without CD were selected to establish whether the presence of anti-MICA antibodies is related to CD or if they are another serological marker of autoimmunity. The composition of this group with respect to represented ADs is similar to that for patients with CD and ADs (Table 2).

Finally, 200 healthy individuals matched by age (mean age 23 ±18.74 years, 54% females) were selected for comparison to patients with CD. Control individuals had no history of intolerance to gluten or derivatives, iron deficiency, anemia, or abnormalities in biochemical studies, and were negative for anti-TG antibodies. To match healthy controls and patients with CD by age, the proportion of individuals aged ≤14 years was similar in both groups (47% versus 52%). Children used as healthy controls were selected from those with suspected allergic reactions who were studied in the Allergology Department of Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of each hospital (Regional Ethics Committee of Clinical Research of Principado de Asturias; Ethical Committee of S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna; Ethical Committee of Clinical Research from the Clinic Hospital, University of Valladolid; Cantabria Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research). All patients and controls or their parents gave written informed consent.

Determining anti-endomysium and anti-transglutaminase autoantibodies

Anti-endomysium antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence using tissue sections from monkey esophagus (Biosystems, Barcelona, Spain). A titer of 1:10 or more was considered positive. Anti-tTG autoantibodies were detected using an ELISA kit from Orgentec (Mannheim, Germany). A value greater than 10 units was considered positive. Patients’ sera were tested for total immunoglobulins (Ig) to detect IgA deficiency. In participants with IgA deficiencies, IgG equivalents of the above tests were used.

HLA and MICA typing

Genomic DNA from all patients was isolated and typed for the HLA-DQ allele using DNA PCR amplification with sequence-specific primers with the PROTRANSTM Domino System HLA Celiac Disease kit (Protrans, Ketsch, Germany). Additionally, MICA gene polymorphisms from 100 patients were typed with a LABType® SSO MICA typing kit (One-Lambda, Los Angeles, CA, USA). All determinations were done in accordance with the manufacturers’ protocols.

Anti-MICA antibody detection

MICA antibodies were identified by LABScreen® assays (One-Lambda) using Luminex xMAP technology (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX, USA), following the manufacturer’s specifications. Serum samples from patient with CD and controls were tested against MICA alleles using the LABScreen® Mixed kit for general screening. Positive sera were re-tested using LABScreen® MICA Single Antigen to measure the specificity of the antibodies. The fluorescent signal for each MICA allele-coated bead was measured using LABScan 100TM Flow Cytometry and analyzed by HLA-FusionTM software (One-Lambda). Antibodies against MICA alleles were considered positive when the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of each bead was above a cut-off value of 500 in LABScreen® Mixed and 2000 in LABScreen® MICA Single Antigen, as suggested by the manufacturer. In all cases, anti-MICA antibodies detected by this technique were of the IgG isotype.


Descriptive analyses were used to characterize the study population. The chi-square contingency test was used to compare dichotomous variables and the unpaired t-test was used to compare group differences of continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the variables that were significant in univariate analyses or that were of clinical relevance. All analyses were done using SPSS v.15.0. Values of P <0.05 were considered significant in all cases.


Anti-MICA autoantibodies are more prevalent in patients with celiac disease

Our initial aim was to analyze anti-MICA antibodies in sera obtained from patients diagnosed with CD and from healthy controls. We found that their presence was clearly associated with CD. Anti-MICA antibodies were detected in 159 of 383 patients with CD (41.5%) compared with 3.5% of the healthy controls (P <0.0001; Table 3). In other words, the odds of individuals with CD presenting anti-MICA antibodies were 19 times those of healthy controls. Next, to establish whether anti-MICA autoantibodies are a characteristic of CD but not a frequent feature of other ADs, we compared their frequency in patients with CD with the group who were diagnosed only with ADs. Our results demonstrated that these autoantibodies were associated with CD (41.5% in the CD group versus 8.2% in the AD group; P <0.0001; odds ratio = 7.97; 95% confidence interval: 5.38, 11.90). Anti-MICA antibodies were no longer present in the additional sample of 75% of the patients with CD who had been on a GFD for at least one year. The second serum was positive for anti-tTG antibodies in ten patients, six of whom had anti-MICA antibodies (data not shown).
Table 3

Prevalence of anti-MICA autoantibodies in patients and healthy controls


Patients with celiac disease

Patients with autoimmune disease

Healthy controls


n = 383

n = 428

n = 200


159 (41.5%)

35 (8.2%)a

7 (3.5%)b


224 (58.5%)

393 (91.8%)

193 (96.5%)

a P <0.0001; odds ratio = 7.97; 95% CI = 5.38, 11.90. b P <0.0001; odds ratio = 19.57; 95% confidence interval = 8.96, 42.74.

We compared the maximum MFI of anti-MICA autoantibodies with the values of anti-tTG ones, but found no correlation between them (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The distribution of maximum MFI among the different groups of patients was also analysed, but revealed no statistically significant differences (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

The specificities of the anti-MICA antibodies were determined in 50 randomly selected patients, combining Luminex single antigen analysis with MICA genotyping. In all cases, the antibodies recognized self-MICA alleles. Moreover, 22 patients also developed antibodies against other MICA variants. The most frequent MICA antigen detected was MICA*027, which corresponds to the MICA A5.1 transmembrane polymorphism, which has previously been associated with CD [2931]. The allele was present in 74% of patients (data not shown).

Anti-MICA autoantibodies are related to age at diagnosis

Having identified the presence of anti-MICA antibodies, we investigated whether other factors related to CD had influenced their induction. First, we analyzed the influence of patient age at diagnosis on the development of antibodies (Table 4). Clearly, anti-MICA autoantibodies were more prevalent at early ages: the mean age of people positive for anti-MICA was 21.03 years compared to 31.60 years for people negative for anti-MICA; and the median age was significantly lower in positive compared to negative individuals (12 versus 31 years; P <0.01). The tendency of antibodies to appear at a younger age was apparent in all patient and control groups (Table 4).
Table 4

Distribution of anti-MICA autoantibodies in different patient groups included in the study by age at diagnosis




















< 0.01

Healthy controls













Patients with celiac disease













Patients with autoimmune disease














No relationship was found between the presence of anti-MICA antibodies and gender or the degree of the Marsh lesion (see Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2).

The risk of developing additional autoimmune diseases in patients with celiac disease is associated with anti-MICA autoantibodies

Patients with CD had a higher incidence of additional ADs, mainly type 1 diabetes [22, 24, 32]. The prevalence of these diseases was relatively high in our population; 58 patients with CD (15.1%) were found to have concomitant disease (Table 1). To identify possible risk factors related to CD that could be involved in the development of these pathologies, a multivariate analysis was performed. This indicated that gender, HLA-DQ and Marsh type were not associated with the presence of ADs in these patients. However, patients with an additional autoimmune pathology were older, on average, than those who were affected by CD alone (mean age, 36 ±20.18 versus 18 ±20.62 years, P <0.001; data not shown).

We investigated the possible influence of anti-MICA autoantibodies on the development of additional ADs (Table 5). The majority of patients with CD and ADs were positive for anti-MICA antibodies (79.3%; 46 out of 58), whereas only 34.8% (113 out of 325) of patients affected by CD alone had anti-MICA (Table 5), demonstrating that the development of ADs in patients with CD was clearly associated with the presence of anti-MICA autoantibodies (P <0.0001; odds ratio = 6.11; 95% confidence interval: 3.22, 11.59). When the analysis also adjusted for age, the risk associated with anti-MICA was notably higher (P <0.0001; odds ratio = 11.69; 95% confidence interval: 5.49, 24.90).
Table 5

Risk of developing concomitant autoimmune diseases in patients with celiac disease with respect to the presence of anti-MICA autoantibodies


Celiac disease only

Celiac disease with autoimmune disease


n = 325

n = 58



113 (34.8%)

46 (79.3%)



212 (65.2%)

12 (20.7%)



Odds ratio

95% confidence interval




3.22, 11.59




5.49, 24.90

Risk associated with the presence of anti-MICA in all patients with CD. aAdjusted by age at diagnosis.

As previously mentioned, ADs were more prevalent in patients diagnosed with CD as adults, whereas anti-MICA autoantibodies were more frequent in those diagnosed with CD at pediatric age. Given the well-established influence of age at diagnosis on the risk of developing concomitant ADs due to anti-MICA, we decided to investigate the influence of these autoantibodies in pediatric and adult patients. The distribution in the two groups indicated that autoantibodies were present in 74.4% of adult patients with concomitant ADs, with an associated risk of 10.03 (P <0.0001), whereas 93.3% of pediatric patients with CD and an additional autoimmune pathology had anti-MICA antibodies (P <0.01). The risk associated with anti-MICA in children was 16.28, which was higher than that in adult patients (Table 6).
Table 6

Risk of developing concomitant autoimmune diseases in patients with celiac disease with respect to the presence of anti-MICA autoantibodies, according to age at diagnosis


Celiac disease only

Celiac disease with autoimmune diseases

Age groups






(n = 186)

(n = 139)

(n = 15)

(n = 43)


76 (40.9%)

26 (18.7%)

14 (93.3%)

32 (74.4%)


110 (59.1%)

113 (81.3%)

1 (6.7%)

11 (25.6%)




Odds ratio

95% confidence interval





2.10, 126.34





4.64, 21.66

Risk associated with the presence of anti-MICA in pediatric (≤14 years) and adult (>14 years) groups.


The mechanisms leading to systemic autoimmune aggression in patients with CD remain unknown. NKG2D and their ligands could play a significant role in the development of autoimmunity. In fact, these molecules are involved in the pathogenesis of some ADs that are commonly associated with CD, such as type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. For example, blockage of NKG2D in the pre-diabetic stage in non-obese diabetic mice prevents the development of diabetes [33]. In rheumatoid arthritis, MICA and MICB are aberrantly expressed in pathological tissue from affected joints and could be involved in the continuation of the autoreactive process [34].

We found anti-MICA antibodies to be present in half of the patients with untreated CD but in only 3.5% of healthy controls. Moreover, anti-MICA antibodies were present in most patients diagnosed with CD plus other ADs, but were rare in patients solely with ADs. Furthermore, anti-MICA antibodies disappeared from most patients after a year on a GFD, similar to what occurs with anti-tTG antibodies. These results imply that, generally, the relationship between anti-MICA and associated ADs is directly linked to CD rather than being a phenomenon specifically associated with autoimmunity. However, as previously mentioned, early-onset SLE may be an exception to this pattern, since these antibodies have also been described in this disease [18].

Previous studies of CD show that MICA protein is overexpressed in enterocytes obtained from the damaged mucosa of patients [13, 17]. A high level of MICA expression seems to promote mucosal damage by infiltrating intraepithelial CD8+ T lymphocytes, which express the MICA receptor, NKG2D. In fact, other authors have suggested that overexpression of MICA could be an initiating event in the progression of mucosal damage [3537]. In the early phase of CD, some gluten-derived peptides, which have been characterized as non-immunogenic, are directly involved in increasing expression of MICA and IL-15. These ‘toxic’ peptides activate the innate immunity through an unknown pathway, leading to the destruction of the gut mucosa [35]. As has been demonstrated in other inflammatory processes, massive cellular destruction may be involved in the development of autoantibodies [38]. In CD, an initially higher level of expression of MICA due to gluten-derived peptides followed by the destruction of enterocytes by intraepithelial lymphocytes could trigger the subsequent development of anti-MICA antibodies in susceptible individuals.

The fact that fewer than half of patients with CD have anti-MICA prevents the use of this antibody as a diagnostic marker. However, the greater prevalence of these autoantibodies in patients with additional ADs observed in our study implies that anti-MICA antibodies might be useful for predicting the risk of AD development. ADs are diseases that are frequently associated with CD. Several studies have found a close association between a long period of gluten exposure [15, 39] and a common genetic background, although others found no relationship between ADs and prolonged gluten intake in CD [40]. We found that ADs in our group of patients were more frequent in adults than in the young, but this could be related to the established effect of age on the prevalence of these diseases, rather than due to the duration of gluten exposure. Moreover, the association of anti-MICA autoantibodies with the presence of additional ADs is substantially modified by age. Surprisingly, although ADs are more frequent in adults with CD, the risk associated with anti-MICA antibodies of developing concomitant AD is clearly greater in childhood, so the determination of these autoantibodies may be very useful in clinical practice to establish the risk in children. In our study, only one pediatric patient with ADs was negative for anti-MICA autoantibodies. In children, CD and other ADs are usually more aggressive processes than in adults. In CD, this could result in increased expression of MIC molecules in younger patients, which would favor the generation of autoantibodies. The presence of anti-MICA autoantibodies could augment tissue destruction and lead to the early development of ADs. As mentioned previously, Dai et al. also demonstrated the presence of anti-MICA autoantibodies in 27 patients with juvenile-onset SLE [18]. Our group of 428 patients with AD included 92 diagnosed with SLE. Six of these patients were classified as juvenile-onset SLE and all had anti-MICA (data not shown). Although these antibodies have not been directly implicated in the disease, they might be an additional risk factor in the development of SLE and an interesting biomarker in the diagnostic of this disease in childhood.


Anti-MICA autoantibodies were present in fewer than half of patients with CD, which make them less useful than other autoantibodies, such as anti-tTG or anti-deamidated gliadin, as a diagnostic biomarker. Moreover, all patients included in the study were positive for anti-tTG although the absence of these autoantibodies does not discard the diagnosis of CD, especially in children. Therefore, it would be of great interest to analyze anti-MICA in a population of patients with CD patients who do not have anti-tTG autoantibodies.

Another limitation of this study is the small number of patients with CD and a concomitant AD, which is especially relevant in the group of pediatric patients.


We have shown here that the development of anti-MICA antibodies is associated with a gluten-containing diet in patients with CD. In addition, anti-MICA antibodies are apparently related to the development of ADs, especially in younger patients although the number of individuals in this study group was small. The determination of these autoantibodies might be less suitable than others for the diagnosis of the disease, but it could be very useful in clinical practice for predicting the development of associated ADs in patients with CD.

The mechanism by which these antibodies could influence the development of autoimmunity might be related to direct tissue damage, the activation of cellular immunity, or another mechanism similar to that demonstrated for anti-tTG in other studies [812]. Further work is needed to establish the role and significance of these autoantibodies in CD and, possibly, in other ADs such as SLE, especially in patients with a young age of onset.



autoimmune disease


celiac disease


confidence interval


enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


gluten-free diet


human leukocyte antigen






mean fluorescence intensity


MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence


natural killer lymphocyte


polymerase chain reaction


systemic lupus erythematosus


tissue transglutaminase.



We wish to thank Pablo Martinez Camblor for the critical review of the statistical part of the study. This work is supported by Spanish grants PI12-02587 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, RETICS REDiNREN (RD12/0021/0021) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and by the European Union Fondos FEDER.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Mucosal Immunology Laboratory, Department of Paediatrics and Immunology-IBGM, University of Valladolid
Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna
Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IFIMAV
Fundación Renal “Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo”


  1. Gujral N, Freeman HJ, Thomson AB: Celiac disease: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. WJG. 2012, 18: 6036-6059. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6036.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ludvigsson JF, Rubio-Tapia A, van Dyke CT, Melton LJ, Zinsmeister AR, Lahr BD, Murray JA: Increasing incidence of celiac disease in a North American population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013, 108: 818-824. 10.1038/ajg.2013.60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. DePaolo RW, Abadie V, Tang F, Fehlner-Peach H, Hall JA, Wang W, Marietta EV, Kasarda DD, Waldmann TA, Murray JA, Semrad C, Kupfer SS, Belkaid Y, Guandalini S, Jabri B: Co-adjuvant effects of retinoic acid and IL-15 induce inflammatory immunity to dietary antigens. Nature. 2011, 471: 220-224. 10.1038/nature09849.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Marsh MN: Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology. 1992, 102: 330-354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Londei M, Maiuri L, Quaratino S: A search for the holy grail: non-toxic gluten for celiac patients. Gastroenterology. 2005, 129: 1111-1113. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dieterich W, Ehnis T, Bauer M, Donner P, Volta U, Riecken EO, Schuppan D: Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 797-801. 10.1038/nm0797-797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Molberg O, McAdam SN, Sollid LM: Role of tissue transglutaminase in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000, 30: 232-240. 10.1097/00005176-200003000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zanoni G, Navone R, Lunardi C, Tridente G, Bason C, Sivori S, Beri R, Dolcino M, Valletta E, Corrocher R, Puccetti A: In celiac disease, a subset of autoantibodies against transglutaminase binds toll-like receptor 4 and induces activation of monocytes. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: e358-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030358.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Barone MV, Caputo I, Ribecco MT, Maglio M, Marzari R, Sblattero D, Troncone R, Auricchio S, Esposito C: Humoral immune response to tissue transglutaminase is related to epithelial cell proliferation in celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2007, 132: 1245-1253. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.01.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Teesalu K, Panarina M, Uibo O, Uibo R, Utt M: Autoantibodies from patients with celiac disease inhibit transglutaminase 2 binding to heparin/heparan sulfate and interfere with intestinal epithelial cell adhesion. Amino Acids. 2012, 42: 1055-1064. 10.1007/s00726-011-1020-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Myrsky E, Kaukinen K, Syrjanen M, Korponay-Szabo IR, Maki M, Lindfors K: Coeliac disease-specific autoantibodies targeted against transglutaminase 2 disturb angiogenesis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008, 152: 111-119. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03600.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Myrsky E, Caja S, Simon-Vecsei Z, Korponay-Szabo IR, Nadalutti C, Collighan R, Mongeot A, Griffin M, Maki M, Kaukinen K, Lindfors K: Celiac disease IgA modulates vascular permeability in vitro through the activity of transglutaminase 2 and RhoA. CMLS. 2009, 66: 3375-3385. 10.1007/s00018-009-0116-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meresse B, Chen Z, Ciszewski C, Tretiakova M, Bhagat G, Krausz TN, Raulet DH, Lanier LL, Groh V, Spies T, Ebert EC, Green PH, Jabri B: Coordinated induction by IL15 of a TCR-independent NKG2D signaling pathway converts CTL into lymphokine-activated killer cells in celiac disease. Immunity. 2004, 21: 357-366. 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bahram S, Bresnahan M, Geraghty DE, Spies T: A second lineage of mammalian major histocompatibility complex class I genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 6259-6263. 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6259.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lopez-Larrea C, Suarez-Alvarez B, Lopez-Soto A, Lopez-Vazquez A, Gonzalez S: The NKG2D receptor: sensing stressed cells. Trends Mol Med. 2008, 14: 179-189. 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.02.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Groh V, Rhinehart R, Randolph-Habecker J, Topp MS, Riddell SR, Spies T: Costimulation of CD8alphabeta T cells by NKG2D via engagement by MIC induced on virus-infected cells. Nat Immunol. 2001, 2: 255-260. 10.1038/85321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hue S, Mention JJ, Monteiro RC, Zhang S, Cellier C, Schmitz J, Verkarre V, Fodil N, Bahram S, Cerf-Bensussan N, Caillat-Zucman S: A direct role for NKG2D/MICA interaction in villous atrophy during celiac disease. Immunity. 2004, 21: 367-377. 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dai Z, Turtle CJ, Booth GC, Riddell SR, Gooley TA, Stevens AM, Spies T, Groh V: Normally occurring NKG2D + CD4+ T cells are immunosuppressive and inversely correlated with disease activity in juvenile-onset lupus. J Exp Med. 2009, 206: 793-805. 10.1084/jem.20081648.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Zou Y, Heinemann FM, Grosse-Wilde H, Sireci G, Wang Z, Lavingia B, Stastny P: Detection of anti-MICA antibodies in patients awaiting kidney transplantation, during the post-transplant course, and in eluates from rejected kidney allografts by Luminex flow cytometry. Hum Immunol. 2006, 67: 230-237. 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.02.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zou Y, Stastny P, Susal C, Dohler B, Opelz G: Antibodies against MICA antigens and kidney-transplant rejection. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 1293-1300. 10.1056/NEJMoa067160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Terasaki PI, Ozawa M, Castro R: Four-year follow-up of a prospective trial of HLA and MICA antibodies on kidney graft survival. Am J Transplant. 2007, 7: 408-415. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01644.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Suarez-Alvarez B, Lopez-Vazquez A, Gonzalez MZ, Fdez-Morera JL, Diaz-Molina B, Blanco-Gelaz MA, Pascual D, Martinez-Borra J, Muro M, Alvarez-Lopez MR, Lopez-Larrea C: The relationship of anti-MICA antibodies and MICA expression with heart allograft rejection. Am J Transplant. 2007, 7: 1842-1848. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01838.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Suarez-Alvarez B, Lopez-Vazquez A, Diaz-Pena R, Diaz-Molina B, Blanco-Garcia RM, Alvarez-Lopez MR, Lopez-Larrea C: Post-transplant soluble MICA and MICA antibodies predict subsequent heart graft outcome. Trans Immunol. 2006, 17: 43-46. 10.1016/j.trim.2006.09.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cosnes J, Cellier C, Viola S, Colombel JF, Michaud L, Sarles J, Hugot JP, Ginies JL, Dabadie A, Mouterde O, Allez M, Nion-Larmurier I: Incidence of autoimmune diseases in celiac disease: protective effect of the gluten-free diet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008, 6: 753-758. 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McNeish AS, Harms HK, Rey J, Shmerling DH, Visakorpi JK, Walker-Smith JA: The diagnosis of coeliac disease. A commentary on the current practices of members of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN). Arch Dis Child. 1979, 54: 783-786. 10.1136/adc.54.10.783.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabo IR, Mearin ML, Phillips A, Shamir R, Troncone R, Giersiepen K, Branski D, Catassi C, Lelgeman M, Maki M, Ribes-Koninckx C, Ventura A, Zimmer KP: European society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012, 54: 136-160. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821a23d0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bai JC, Fried M, Corazza GR, Schuppan D, Farthing M, Catassi C, Greco L, Cohen H, Ciacci C, Eliakim R, Fasano A, Gonzalez A, Krabshuis JH, LeMair A: World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines on celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013, 47: 121-126. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31827a6f83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bai JC, Fried M, Corazza GR, Schuppan D, Farthing M, Catassi C, Greco L, Cohen H, Ciacci C, Fasano A, Gonzalez A, Krabshuis JH, LeMair A: Celiac Disease. WGO Global Guidelines. 2012, Scholar
  29. Lopez-Vazquez A, Rodrigo L, Fuentes D, Riestra S, Bousono C, Garcia-Fernandez S, Martinez-Borra J, Gonzalez S, Lopez-Larrea C: MICA-A5.1 allele is associated with atypical forms of celiac disease in HLA-DQ2-negative patients. Immunogenetics. 2002, 53: 989-991. 10.1007/s00251-001-0413-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lopez-Vazquez A, Rodrigo L, Fuentes D, Riestra S, Bousono C, Garcia-Fernandez S, Martinez-Borra J, Gonzalez S, Lopez-Larrea C: MHC class I chain related gene A (MICA) modulates the development of coeliac disease in patients with the high risk heterodimer DQA1*0501/DQB1*0201. Gut. 2002, 50: 336-340. 10.1136/gut.50.3.336.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Tinto N, Ciacci C, Calcagno G, Gennarelli D, Spampanato A, Farinaro E, Tortora R, Sacchetti L: Increased prevalence of celiac disease without gastrointestinal symptoms in adults MICA 5.1 homozygous subjects from the Campania area. Digest Liver Dis. 2008, 40: 248-252. 10.1016/j.dld.2007.11.028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Salardi S, Volta U, Zucchini S, Fiorini E, Maltoni G, Vaira B, Cicognani A: Prevalence of celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus increased in the mid-1990s: an 18-year longitudinal study based on anti-endomysial antibodies. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008, 46: 612-614. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31815d697e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ogasawara K, Hamerman JA, Ehrlich LR, Bour-Jordan H, Santamaria P, Bluestone JA, Lanier LL: NKG2D blockade prevents autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. Immunity. 2004, 20: 757-767. 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.05.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Groh V, Bruhl A, El-Gabalawy H, Nelson JL, Spies T: Stimulation of T cell autoreactivity by anomalous expression of NKG2D and its MIC ligands in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 9452-9457. 10.1073/pnas.1632807100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin-Pagola A, Ortiz L, Perez de Nanclares G, Vitoria JC, Castano L, Bilbao JR: Analysis of the expression of MICA in small intestinal mucosa of patients with celiac disease. J Clin Immunol. 2003, 23: 498-503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Perera L, Shao L, Patel A, Evans K, Meresse B, Blumberg R, Geraghty D, Groh V, Spies T, Jabri B, Mayer L: Expression of nonclassical class I molecules by intestinal epithelial cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007, 13: 298-307. 10.1002/ibd.20026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lopez-Vazquez ARL, Gonzalez S, Lopez-Larrea C: NKG2D ligands expression patterns in gut mucosa from patients with coeliac disease. Inmunologia. 2013, 32: 43-49. 10.1016/j.inmuno.2013.03.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Makhlouf L, Kishimoto K, Smith RN, Abdi R, Koulmanda M, Winn HJ, Auchincloss H, Sayegh MH: The role of autoimmunity in islet allograft destruction: major histocompatibility complex class II matching is necessary for autoimmune destruction of allogeneic islet transplants after T-cell costimulatory blockade. Diabetes. 2002, 51: 3202-3210. 10.2337/diabetes.51.11.3202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ventura A, Magazzu G, Greco L: Duration of exposure to gluten and risk for autoimmune disorders in patients with celiac disease. SIGEP Study Group for Autoimmune Disorders in Celiac Disease. Gastroenterol. 1999, 117: 297-303. 10.1053/gast.1999.0029900297.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sategna Guidetti C, Solerio E, Scaglione N, Aimo G, Mengozzi G: Duration of gluten exposure in adult coeliac disease does not correlate with the risk for autoimmune disorders. Gut. 2001, 49: 502-505. 10.1136/gut.49.4.502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© López-Vázquez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.