# Suicide attempts in clinical trials with paroxetine randomised against placebo

- Ivar Aursnes
^{1}Email author, - Ingunn Fride Tvete
^{2}, - Jorund Gaasemyr
^{2}and - Bent Natvig
^{2}

**3**:14

**DOI: **10.1186/1741-7015-3-14

© Aursnes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

**Received: **08 March 2005

**Accepted: **22 August 2005

**Published: **22 August 2005

## Abstract

### Background

Inclusion of unpublished data on the effects of antidepressants on children has suggested unfavourable risk-benefit profiles for some of the drugs. Recent meta-analyses of studies on adults have indicated similar effects. We obtained unpublished data for paroxetine that have so far not been included in these analyses.

### Methods

The documentation for drug registration contained 16 studies in which paroxetine had been randomised against placebo. We registered the number of suicides, suicide attempts and ideation. We corrected for duration of medication and placebo treatment and used a standard Bayesian statistical approach with varying priors.

### Results

There were 7 suicide attempts in patients on the drug and 1 in a patient on placebo. We found that the probability of increased intensity of suicide attempts per year in adults taking paroxetine was 0.90 with a "pessimistic" prior, and somewhat less with two more neutral priors.

### Conclusion

Our findings support the results of recent meta-analyses. Patients and doctors should be warned that the increased suicidal activity observed in children and adolescents taking certain antidepressant drugs may also be present in adults.

## Background

The debate about whether the use of antidepressant drugs increases suicidal activity has recently been sharpened after more than 10 years of turmoil [1]. Conclusions concerning children and adolescents have been drawn [2]. Inclusion of unpublished data suggested unfavourable risk-benefit profiles for some of the drugs. For adults, industry points to the absence of data refuting the null hypothesis (no such increase).

In a February 19^{th} BMJ editorial [3] accompanying two meta-analyses of suicidal activities in adult patients on SSRIs [4, 5], the authors failed to convey the unanimous conclusion in the reviewed studies of an increased risk of suicidal attempts. Admittedly, one of the analyses only touched statistical significance, but that might have been due to the withholding of data by the manufacturer of one of the drugs. We have had access to some of those missing data. Recently we were given the opportunity to review the clinical data on paroxetine as presented to the world's drug regulatory agencies in 1989. One of the published meta-analyses [4] contained summaries of the documentation provided by the marketing authorization holders to the MHRA, which did not distinguish between suicidal attempt and suicidal ideation for paroxetine. We studied the primary data and even the individual case descriptions when available. Another meta-analysis [5] reported published data only, whereas most of our data were from unpublished studies. Moreover, as opposed to the BMJ authors, we have based our statistical analysis on comparing intensities of suicide attempts per year in drug and placebo groups, taking the exposure time of the patients properly into account. We now present our findings and estimate the degree of support for the idea of an increased intensity per year of suicide attempts in adults.

## Methods

We included only double blind, parallel design studies with patients (all adults) randomised to either paroxetine or placebo. Altogether 16 studies met these criteria (references 79 to 93 and 95 in the Expert Report), containing respectively 916 and 550 paroxetine and placebo treated patients. The study period was in most instances 6 weeks. One important exception was a study (reference 91) with a preponderance of paroxetine use over placebo and lasting for 17 weeks. Patients were excluded from the studies after a suicide-related event. Taking this censoring into account, paroxetine treatment made up 190.7 patient years altogether and placebo 73.3 patient years. Suicide-related events could be found in tables in the Expert Report, in the adverse reactions section in the individual study reports, and in the individual patient descriptions.

We let θ_{p} be the intensity per year of a suicide attempt in the placebo group and θ_{d} the intensity per year in the drug group, for a random patient in the 16 studies; correspondingly, X_{p} and X_{d} represent the total numbers of suicide attempts. We can have at most one suicide attempt for each patient. Taking this censoring into account, we denoted the corresponding patient years in the 16 studies combined by m_{p} and m_{d}. In addition, patients in both the placebo and drug groups are supposed to behave in a similar manner. It then follows that the likelihood of the experiment corresponds to X_{p} and X_{d} having Poisson distributions respectively with parameters (m_{p}θ_{p}) and (m_{d} θ_{d}). In addition, we assume that the two variables were conditionally independent given the parameters. The corresponding observed data are (x_{p,} m_{p}) and (x_{d,} m_{d}), and the prior information is denoted by (x^{o}_{p}, m^{o}_{p}) and (x^{o}_{d}, m^{o}_{d}).

The Bayesian approach is based on the construction of probability distributions for θ_{p} and θ_{d} . This does not mean that these parameters are to be interpreted as random variables, but our knowledge of the parameters is uncertain and we describe this uncertainty with the help of probability distributions. Probability distributions describing our initial uncertainty are called prior distributions (that is, before real data are collected). When the real data are taken into account, the prior distributions are updated by Bayes' formula to posterior distributions. An excellent introduction to Bayesian methods in medicine is given by Spiegelhalter et al. [6].

We assume that the prior distribution for θ_{p} is gamma, with parameters x^{o}_{p} and m^{o}_{p}, while correspondingly θ_{d} has the parameters x^{o}_{d} and m^{o}_{d} and is assumed to be independent of the prior distribution for θ_{p}. Hence, standard Bayesian theory gives the posterior distribution of θ_{p} as gamma, with parameters x^{o}_{p} + x_{p} and m^{o}_{p} + m_{p,} while θ_{d} will have the parameters x^{o}_{d} + x_{d} and m^{o}_{d} + m_{d}. We performed simulations by making 80000 random draws of θ_{d} and θ_{p} from their independent gamma posterior distributions, computed the logarithms of the ratios θ_{d}/θ_{p,} and constructed diagrams by applying a standard density estimation technique to these logarithms. (The logarithm was introduced to avoid an unwelcome feature of the density estimation method.) Note that the logarithm of the ratio θ_{d}/θ_{p} is greater than zero whenever θ_{d} is greater than θ_{p}. Hence, we calculated the probabilities that medication with paroxetine is associated with an increased intensity of a suicide attempt per year as the proportions of logarithmic ratios greater than zero in the samples. This corresponds to areas below the densities to the right of zero in the diagrams.

The grounds for a pessimistic prior have been given by Healy and Whitaker [7] who, relating the occurrence of suicidal activities to the use of antidepressant drugs, estimated an odds ratio of 2.4 from evidence given in clinical trials, epidemiological observations and case histories. The clinical trial data they used included, but were not restricted to, studies with the active drugs randomised against placebo. Mathematically, we chose to express this view as equivalent to observing two (x^{o}_{d}) events with paroxetine during 50 (m^{o}_{d}) patient years and one (x^{o}_{p}) with placebo during 50 (m^{o}_{p}) patient years, adding up to 3 attempts per 100 patient years, which is similar to our observed average value for paroxetine and placebo taken together. We based the calculations on a total of only 100 (m^{o}_{d} + m^{o}_{p}) patient years in the prior, compared to 264 (m_{d} + m_{p}) patient years in the real data, in order to increase the importance of the real data over the prior information. The slightly optimistic and slightly pessimistic priors represent respectively a paper by Lapierre [8] (appearing in tandem with Healy and Whitaker) and the article that reported suicidal ideation in children medicated with paroxetine [2]. The former author took the attitude that, if anything, there were slight signs of reduced suicidal activity connected with antidepressants, whereas the latter authors left the reader with the assumption that the observed increased suicidal ideation in children must somehow be reflected in adults. We assigned the numbers of suicidal patients on paroxetine and placebo per 50 patient years to be respectively 1.35 and 1.65 and *vice versa*.

## Results

Suicide attempts and ideation in randomised clinical trials with paroxetine against placebo. Extracted from "APPLICATION FOR MARKETING AUTHORIZATION: SEROXAT" 1989. * Referring to list in Part I, Volume 3

Patient identification number | Study reference number* | Suicidal attempt | Suicidal ideation | Medication | Tabulated | Individually described |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

02 01 009 | 79 | X | Placebo | Yes | Yes | |

02 04 089 | 82 | X | Paroxetine | Yes | Yes | |

03 002 034 | 84 | X | Placebo | No | Yes | |

04 02 056 | 84 | X | Paroxetine | Yes | Yes | |

1 09 021 | 90 | X | Washout | Yes | Yes | |

09 01A 005 | 91 | X | Paroxetine | Yes | Yes | |

09-01A-006 | 91 | X | Paroxetine | No | Yes | |

09 01E 260 | 91 | X | Paroxetine | Yes | No | |

09 01J 573 | 91 | X | Paroxetine | Yes | Yes | |

09-OU-620 | 91 | X | Paroxetine | No | Yes | |

09-01G-405 | 91 | X | Paroxetine | No | Yes | |

037 | 93 | X | Paroxetine | No | Yes | |

07 01A 001 | 95 | X | Paroxetine | Yes | Yes |

_{d}/θ

_{p}are shown in figure 1, and the corresponding posterior distributions are shown in figure 2. The probability that medication with paroxetine is associated with an increased intensity per year of a suicide attempt is 0.90 with the pessimistic prior (Healy and Whitaker [7]), and 0.79 (Lapierre [8]) and 0.85 (Whittington

*et al.*[2]) with the two other priors. The corresponding prior probabilities were respectively 0.75, 0.42 and 0.58.

## Discussion

We believe that the chosen studies are similar enough to be pooled for analysis. This view is supported by the similarities of the protocols for the various studies, although the populations that were studied differed considerably. We also believe it is best to count patient years rather than patients, although claims have been made for the contrary [7]. At least, counting patient years is a more conservative approach. Furthermore, to treat the patient as a unit and to assume binomial distributions would be inappropriate since patients have different follow-up times and hence different probabilities of suicide attempts within both the placebo and the drug groups.

Another statistical approach would have been to express the prior distributions in terms of independent priors for θ_{p} and the ratio θ_{d}/θ_{p}, with a common, relatively weak prior for θ_{p} in all three formulations. This was our approach in a previous publication using basically the same method [9]. To make things simpler and perhaps more transparent in this short paper, we have not used this approach here.

## Conclusion

Although we report a small data set, by taking various priors into account the data strongly suggest that the use of SSRIs is connected with an increased intensity of suicide attempts per year. The two meta-analyses and our contribution taken together make a strong case for the conclusion, at least with a short time perspective, that adults taking antidepressants have an increased risk of suicide attempts. We also conclude that the recommendation of restrictions on the use of paroxetine for children and adolescents recently conveyed by regulatory agencies [10] should be extended to include usage by adults.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

Journalist Ane Hoyem, the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK), encouraged this investigation while researching for the medical information program "Puls".

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Breggin PR: Suicidality, violence and mania caused by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI): A review and analysis. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine. 2004, 16: 31-49.
- Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy O, Cottrell D, Cotgrove A, Boddington E: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet. 2004, 363: 1341-1345. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16043-1.PubMedView Article
- Cipriani A, Barbui C, Geddes JR: Suicide, depression, and antidepressants. Patients and clinicians need to balance benefits and harms. BMJ. 2005, 330: 373-374. 10.1136/bmj.330.7488.373.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
- Gunnell D, Saperia J, Ashby D: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and suicide in adults: meta-analysis of drug company data from placebo controlled, randomised controlled trials submitted to the MHRA's safety review. BMJ. 2005, 330: 385-388. 10.1136/bmj.330.7488.385.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
- Fergusson D, Doucette S, Glass KC, Shapiro S, Healy D, Hebert P, Hutton B: Association between suicide attempts and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005, 330: 396-399. 10.1136/bmj.330.7488.396.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
- Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR: An introduction to Bayesian methods in health technology assessment. BMJ. 1999, 319: 508-512.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
- Healy D, Whitaker C: Antidepressants and suicide: risk-benefit conundrums. J Psychiatry Neurosc. 2003, 28: 331-337.
- Lapierre YD: Suicidality with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Valid claim?. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2003, 28: 340-347.PubMedPubMed Central
- Aursnes I, Tvete IF, Gaasemyr J, Natvig B: Clinical efficacies of antihypertensive drugs. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2003, 37: 72-79. 10.1080/14017430310001186.PubMedView Article
- FDA issues public health advisory on cautions for use of antidepressants in adults and children. [http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2004/ANS01283.html]
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/3/14/prepub

### Pre-publication history

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.