Novel equation to determine the hepatic triglyceride concentration in humans by MRI: diagnosis and monitoring of NAFLD in obese patients before and after bariatric surgery
- Raúl Jiménez-Agüero1, 2,
- José I Emparanza2,
- Adolfo Beguiristain1,
- Luis Bujanda1, 3,
- José M Alustiza1, 4,
- Elisabeth García4,
- Elizabeth Hijona1, 3,
- Lander Gallego1,
- Javier Sánchez-González5,
- María J Perugorria1, 3, 6,
- José I Asensio1,
- Santiago Larburu1,
- Maddi Garmendia7,
- Mikel Larzabal7,
- María P Portillo8,
- Leixuri Aguirre8 and
- Jesús M Banales1, 3, 6Email author
© Jiménez-Agüero et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 25 April 2014
Accepted: 23 July 2014
Published: 26 August 2014
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is caused by abnormal accumulation of lipids within liver cells. Its prevalence is increasing in developed countries in association with obesity, and it represents a risk factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Since NAFLD is usually asymptomatic at diagnosis, new non-invasive approaches are needed to determine the hepatic lipid content in terms of diagnosis, treatment and control of disease progression. Here, we investigated the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantitate and monitor the hepatic triglyceride concentration in humans.
A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy was conducted among 129 consecutive adult patients (97 obesity and 32 non-obese) to compare multi-echo MRI fat fraction, grade of steatosis estimated by histopathology, and biochemical measurement of hepatic triglyceride concentration (that is, Folch value).
MRI fat fraction positively correlates with the grade of steatosis estimated on a 0 to 3 scale by histopathology. However, this correlation value was stronger when MRI fat fraction was linked to the Folch value, resulting in a novel equation to predict the hepatic triglyceride concentration (mg of triglycerides/g of liver tissue = 5.082 + (432.104 * multi-echo MRI fat fraction)). Validation of this formula in 31 additional patients (24 obese and 7 controls) resulted in robust correlation between the measured and estimated Folch values. Multivariate analysis showed that none of the variables investigated improves the Folch prediction capacity of the equation. Obese patients show increased steatosis compared to controls using MRI fat fraction and Folch value. Bariatric surgery improved MRI fat fraction values and the Folch value estimated in obese patients one year after surgery.
Multi-echo MRI is an accurate approach to determine the hepatic lipid concentration by using our novel equation, representing an economic non-invasive method to diagnose and monitor steatosis in humans.
KeywordsNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease Magnetic resonance imaging Hepatic fat concentration Obesity Bariatric surgery Diagnosis
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is triggered by intra-hepatocellular accumulation of lipids (mainly triglycerides) and affects up to 30% of the Western population ,. Its pathogenesis usually involves the so-called metabolic syndrome linked to obesity, diabetes, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia and/or insulin resistance. Although NAFLD generally presents a benign course, it may progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and to the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma .
NAFLD is usually asymptomatic at diagnosis . Therefore, determination of the hepatic lipid content poses a major challenge in terms of identification, treatment and control of the disease progression . Currently, the standard procedure used to evaluate hepatic steatosis is the histopathological examination of cross-liver sections and the semi-quantitative estimation of the percentage of hepatocytes (0% to 100%) containing macrovesicular fat, which is graded on a 0 to 3 scale . However, this is an expensive and invasive practice that presents inherent risks. Moreover, it only provides a two-dimensional estimation of a particular biopsy and is subject to inter-individual visual evaluation depending on the pathologist’s training, which usually results in overestimation of the liver fat content . On the other hand, evaluation of steatosis using computational image analysis of histology slides is possible ,, but is not carried out routinely in clinical practice. Therefore, it is essential to establish new non-invasive approaches to accurately determine the hepatic fat concentration, allowing the correct diagnosis and monitoring of steatosis.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a potential non-invasive technique for assessing hepatic steatosis in three-dimensions . It measures the proportion of the mobile proton density of the liver that is attributable to fat . Increasing evidence, using fat-water phantoms and/or histopathological semi-quantitative analysis of hepatic fat as reference standards, suggests that MRI may represent an accurate method to determine the hepatic lipid content ,. However, additional research is still needed to validate this hypothesis and, more importantly, to test the potential of MRI as a tool to determine the hepatic triglyceride concentration (that is, Folch value).
The purpose of our prospective study of diagnostic accuracy was to evaluate the potential of multi-echo MRI to quantitate the hepatic triglyceride concentration. Multi-echo MRI fat fractions were compared with the hepatic steatosis determined by either histopathology or biochemical methods in patients operated for morbid obesity or who underwent liver surgery. Moreover, we analyzed the role of multi-echo MRI to monitor steatosis in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery. Our results indicate that multi-echo MRI is a precise method to determine the hepatic triglyceride concentration utilizing a novel equation and may be routinely employed in clinical practice to diagnose and monitor steatosis.
Patient selection and study design
We designed a prospective and cross-sectional single-site study of diagnostic accuracy (from January 2009 to January 2014), which was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Donostia University Hospital as defined by Spanish law and European directives. An informed consent form approved by the institutional review board was signed by all patients before starting the study.
For the non-obese group, we included all consecutive patients referred to our hospital during 2009 for hepatic surgery due to different etiologies without underlying liver disease. The inclusion criterion was a body mass index (BMI) <35 kilograms per square meter.
On the other hand, we included all consecutive obese patients referred to our hospital between 2010 and 2013 for bariatric surgery (gastric sleeve or gastric bypass) or for partial liver resection due to metastatic liver disease without underlying hepatic disease. The inclusion criterion for obese patients was BMI <35 kilograms per square meter. All the patients in this group ranged from 36 to 63 BMI and were classified as obesity class II (BMI = 35 to 39.9) or III (BMI ?40) by the world health organization (WHO) . All obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery had surgical indication for BMI ?40 or BMI = 35 to 39.9 with significant morbidity .
Multi-echo MRI was performed in all patients under study the day before surgery, and a liver biopsy was obtained at the same time as the bariatric or hepatic surgery. Importantly, the MRI-biopsy period was less than 24 hours. Liver biopsies were processed for histopathological studies as well as for quantification of the hepatic fat concentration measured by a lipid assay (see below). Expert professionals involved in each quantification method (that is, MRI, histopathology and lipid assay) performed the analysis blindly.
A validation group with 31 additional patients (24 obese and 7 non-obese) was also included between June 2013 and January 2014 to confirm the efficiency of our new formula to predict the hepatic Folch value from multi-echo MRI. Thus, multi-echo MRI before surgery as well as liver biopsy at the moment of operation were obtained from these patients to compare the measured (by Folch) and the predicted (by MRI) liver triglyceride concentration.
Finally, the aforementioned obese patients received a second multi-echo MRI one year after surgery in order to quantitate and monitor steatosis. In addition, a multivariate analysis (initial Folch estimated, total weight, weight loss, age and gender) of multi-echo MRI fat fraction and Folch estimated was performed.
Gender and age were considered in all patients. Body measurements included weight and standing height at the moment of the liver biopsy. The BMI was calculated from these values. The presence of associated diseases such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea was checked in all patients. In addition, treatment with drugs (that is, contraceptives, statins, immunosuppressives, antidepressants, nifedipines, hormones and paracetamol) was also considered. Biological data for each patient included hematological parameters, liver function tests and lipid profiles.
Liver biopsies were double-blind examined by two expert liver pathologists. All biopsies were obtained from a hepatic wedge in the left anterior liver. Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin solution and embedded in paraffin. Sections 4 μm thick were routinely stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Furthermore, liver steatosis was reported as a semi-quantitative evaluation of the percentage of hepatocytes (0% to 100%) containing macrovesicular fat (that is, lipid droplets equal to or larger than the size of the nucleus, often displacing the nucleus) or microvesicular fat (that is, numerous small fat droplets surrounding a centrally located nucleus). Results were expressed in terms of fat percentage in hepatocytes and ranged from 0 to 3 (that is, 0: no fat, 1: up to 33% fat, 2: 33% to 66% fat, and 3: >66% fat) .
Hepatic lipid assay
The lipid concentration of the liver was determined according to the method described by Folch et al.. This biochemical approach determines the triglyceride concentration in liver samples (mg of triglyceride/g of liver tissue) and was used as a gold standard (that is, reference method) to compare with both MRI data and histology. This method, with some minor modifications, continues to be considered the classic and most reliable approach for quantitatively extracting lipids . Two experienced researchers performed the Folch determinations from liver biopsies without knowing any clinical data or MRI/histological results.
Briefly, liver tissue was washed with saline solution to eliminate any traces of blood and subsequently homogenized with 2:1 chloroform/methanol solution. Samples were then incubated at 50°C for 30 minutes and with 2 ml of KCl 0.1 M to speed up the phase separation process; this mixture was shaken for one minute. Samples were kept for two hours at 4°C, and then centrifuged at 2,000 to 3,000 rpm for 20 minutes to facilitate the separation of the upper phase (or aqueous methanol dragging) and the lower phase (or chloroform phase) containing the lipids. Most of the aqueous phase was removed and the chloroform phase adjusted to a known final volume with chloroform. A volume of 1 ml of the chloroform phase was transferred into a tube previously weighed and the solution was evaporated by drying using a nitrogen stream. The tube was weighed again and the amount of fat calculated by the gravimetric method. Finally, lipids were dissolved in isopropanol and triglycerides measured by spectrophotometry using a commercial kit from Spinreact (SantEsteve de Bas, Spain).
Multi-echo magnetic resonance imaging
The multi-echo MRI technique to assess the tissue fat content was performed as we have previously reported in animal models . Briefly, this method is based on a three-dimensional multi-echo gradient sequence acquired in axial orientation with 12 different echoes (TE min = 1.04 ms, δTE = 0.78 ms, TE Final = 25.14 ms, TR = 72 ms, Flip Angle = 25°, FOV 375/328 mm, matrix resolution 232/129). Images were achieved for spectral analysis of the MRI signal to distinguish between fat and water content in each image pixel. The three-dimensional acquisition (10 consecutive slices: slice thickness = 12 mm) was performed in a single breath-hold of 20 seconds that resulted in a final image of the whole liver anatomy. All the acquisitions were carried out in a 1.5 T Achieva System (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). An integrated quadrature body coil was used in obese patients to fit better inside the scanner. For non-obese patients, images were acquired using a 16-channel phased array coil maintaining the same image parameters previously described in the acquisition method.
Quantitative analysis of the images was performed following a previously published methodology . This approach was implemented in an in-line PRIDE tool that runs in a MR Work Station (Extended Work Space, Philips Healthcare). Importantly, native multi-echo images were not directly analyzed by the radiologist. The software automatically generates the water and fat intensity maps, the water and fat R2* (reciprocal of T2*) maps, and fat fraction maps. Water and fat signal maps are then analyzed by the radiologist as a conventional parametric map (region of interest (ROI) analysis) to calculate the final fat fraction measured as a percentage. The analysis of three ROIs was performed in the fat fraction maps manually dressed in segment III, near to the lower border of the liver, avoiding vascular vessels. The average of three measured fat fraction values was calculated for each patient to provide the final fat fraction content. The radiologist was not aware of other test results. Therefore, the data were not subject to any bias.
Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as absolute and relative frequencies. Coefficient of variation was estimated as a measure of dispersion of continuous data. We used the Student t test for statistical comparisons between two groups of normally distributed variables and Mann-Whitney tests for non-parametric methods. The association of variables with the lipid content in liver tissue (Folch and histology) was carried out by linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) in the case of continuous variables, and by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for categorical variables (or non-parametric tests when necessary).
We considered the Folch determination as the reference test of the liver fat content. To measure the ability of MRI to provide a quantitative liver fat content, we used a linear regression model. All the variables showing a relation with the Folch determination in the univariate analyses with a P value lower than 0.20 were selected for a multivariate model. Using a backwards stepwise linear model we estimated their ability to contribute to improve Folch prediction over the model with MRI alone.
We constructed a calibration graph for the validation dataset and studied the relation between estimated and measured Folch value using a linear regression model.
To assess the effect of clinical parameters on liver fat improvement as measured by MRI (difference between initial MRI-estimated and final MRI-estimated liver fat content), we used backwards stepwise linear regression.
Results were considered to be statistically significant at P <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA® SE v13 software (StataCorp. LP, Drive College Station, TX USA).
Clinical and biological human data
Clinical features of the population under study
Control group (number = 32)
Obese group (number = 97)
Overall (number = 129)
60.9 ± 11.5
46.7 ± 13.4
50.2 ± 14.3
71.9 ± 13.6
120.7 ± 26.3
108.7 ± 31.8
26 ± 4.5
44.6 ± 7.9
40 ± 10.8
Associated diseases and treatments
Obstructive sleep apnea
26.8 ± 12.9
24.7 ± 12.9
25.2 ± 12.9
31.8 ± 20
32.7 ± 21.8
32.4 ± 21.3
53 ± 46.4
35.6 ± 29.3
40.2 ± 35.3
99.9 ± 48.5
71.6 ± 22.4
79.7 ± 34.3
106.9 ± 54.1
163.3 ± 154.8
148.5 ± 137.8
190.6 ± 54.1
200.8 ± 42.6
198.2 ± 45.9
Liver triglyceride content - Biochemical assay (mg/g)
33.3 ± 28.3
94.5 ± 57.1
79.3 ± 57.8
The group of obese patients had a mean age (46.7 ± 13.4 years) that was lower than that of the control group (60.9 ± 11.5 years) (P <0.0001), since obesity was observed in middle-aged persons, and the control group involved liver surgery in older patients. On the other hand, as expected, the group of obese patients showed increased body weight (120.7 ± 26.3 versus 71.9 ± 13.6 Kg) and BMI (44.6 ± 7.9 versus 26 ± 4.5 Kg/m2) compared to the control group (P <0.0001 in both comparisons), as well as increased obstructive sleep apnea (33% versus 3.1%; P <0.001), serum triglycerides (163.3 ± 154.8 versus 106.9 ± 54.1 mg/dL; P <0.01) and hepatic triglyceride content (94.5 ± 57.1 versus 33.3 ± 28.3 mg/g; P <0.0001). Finally, the serological levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were decreased in the obese patients compared to controls (71.6 ± 22.4 versus 99.9 ± 48.5 U/L; P <0.01).
Obese patients showed increased hepatic steatosis compared to controls by histopathological examination
Correlation analysis between multi-echo MRI fat fraction and histopathological estimation of hepatic steatosis in humans
Correlation analysis between the histopathological estimation of hepatic steatosis in humans and the biochemical measurement of the hepatic lipid concentration
Correlation analysis between multi-echo MRI fat fraction and the biochemical measurement of the hepatic lipid concentration
Calculation of the hepatic fat concentration through the multi-echo MRI fat fraction
The aforementioned equation was evaluated with a new validation group of patients. Thus, 31 additional adult patients (24 obese and 7 controls) underwent multi-echo MRI, and their fat fraction was employed to predict their hepatic fat concentration (Folch) by using the formula. Next, these predicted Folch values were compared with the direct biochemical measurement of the hepatic fat concentration. Our data showed that the equation is able to predict the hepatic triglyceride concentration with a strong correlation between 1) the biochemically measured Folch values and 2) the estimated Folch values obtained with the formula (r2 = 0.98; P <0.0001) (Figure 4B).
Univariate analyses of hepatic fat concentration and multivariate evaluation of multi-echo MRI prediction
Univariate analysis of categorical variables in relation to the measured Folch values
Type or presence/absence
Summary of the univariate regression models between continuous variables and the measured Folch values
Obese patients show increased steatosis compared to controls by multi-echo MRI and Folch value, which is improved after bariatric surgery
Final multivariate regression analysis for the MRI-estimated lipid content one year after surgery
Initial estimated Folch
The key findings reported here indicate that MRI is a non-invasive technique able to quantitate the hepatic triglyceride concentration in NAFLD. Our prospective data from 129 adult patients demonstrated that multi-echo MRI fat fraction strongly correlates (r =0.90/adjusted r2 = 0.81) with the biochemical measurement of the hepatic lipid concentration (that is, Folch value), resulting in a novel equation: Folch (mg of triglycerides/g of liver tissue) = 5.082 + (432.104 * multi-echo MRI fat fraction). This formula was afterwards validated in 31 additional adult patients, showing a strong correlation between the Folch measured and MRI-estimated Folch values (r2 = 0.98; P <0.0001). In addition, multi-echo MRI fat fraction positively correlates with the semi-quantitative measurement of steatosis by histopathological examinations (r = 0.77/adjusted r2 = 0.60), but the correlation values were lower than those obtained when the multi-echo MRI fat fraction was correlated with the Folch value. These data, together with the correlation values between Folch and semi-quantitative measurement of steatosis by histopathological examinations (r = 0.71/adjusted r2 = 0.50), indicated that the latter is not an accurate method to determinate the hepatic fat content, and the Folch method should be used as an appropriate gold standard for NAFLD. Folch prediction obtained by multi-echo MRI was not improved when other variables were included in the equation. Obese patients show increased steatosis compared to controls using Folch-measured and MRI-estimated values. Bariatric surgery was followed by a decrease in liver fat content as estimated by MRI one year after surgery, and a substantial part of this improvement is explained by the measured Folch value before surgery and the weight loss after surgery. Our data are consistent with the notion that multi-echo MRI is a non-invasive technique that allows the appropriate estimation of the hepatic fat concentration, and can be employed to diagnose and monitor liver steatosis in humans.
Hepatic fat quantification is receiving increasing attention in clinical practice since the prevalence of steatosis associated with obesity is dramatically affecting developed countries ,; moreover, it is also important for liver transplantation since 30% or more fat content contraindicates liver donation . Therefore, it is essential to establish new non-invasive approaches to determine the hepatic fat concentration accurately, allowing the correct diagnosis and monitoring of steatosis. Up to now, there have been no specific biochemical or serological tests able to diagnose the presence of fatty liver, and even less, methods to quantitate the degree of liver steatosis . The standard procedure is the histological estimation of the percentage of hepatocytes containing macrovesicular fat , which possesses inherent invasive risks and is subject to the variability of visual estimation between observers .
MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy (MRS) are currently considered the most promising and sensitive non-invasive methods to assess the total liver fat content ,,, being postulated as potential screening tools for patients at risk of developing NAFLD (that is, with obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and/or nutritional disorders) ,. MRI can be performed using gradient-echo chemical shift imaging (Dixon method) as T1-weighted dual echo, triple echo, or multi-echo . However, it is important to take into account that liver iron deposition is able to distort local magnetic fields responsible for T2* shortening, and may ultimately result in signal intensity loss. Given the high prevalence of iron deposition in the liver and the considerable variations of T2* of the liver with consequent errors in the quantification of liver steatosis, T2* bias cannot be considered negligible and must be taken into account. In this regard, multi-echo techniques can easily correct for T2* decay and, thus, should be used to give reliable results ,.
Some studies have recently evaluated the diagnostic potential of MRI techniques (that is, two-point Dixon, three-point Dixon, DUAL, Spin echo method and multi-echo gradient-echo) as non-invasive methods to quantitate steatosis. They compared MRI with semi-quantitative analysis of steatosis by histopathological grading, showing different degrees of correlation ,,-. It is important to remark that the MRI-biopsy time interval is a key factor in improving the correlation score, since the hepatic fat content may change over time. In this regard, best correlations were obtained with a MRI-biopsy period of seven days or less .
Here, 129 adult patients were included in our prospective study. Ninety seven patients were obese, a risk factor for hepatic steatosis, and the other 32 were non-obese patients with potential low grades of steatosis who underwent liver resections for several etiologies but without underlying liver disease. Our data indicate that multi-echo MRI fat fraction positively correlates with the semi-quantitative measurement of steatosis by histopathological examinations. Importantly, the MRI-biopsy period in our study was less than 24 hours, resulting in a robust interpretation of the data from this large cohort of patients. However, histopathological analysis of steatosis is not an adequate gold standard for MRI or 1H MRS, since it is a two-dimensional semi-quantitative technique susceptible to inter-individual visual estimation . In this regard, the Folch method is considered the most reliable approach to extract and quantitate lipids . It gives three-dimensional quantitation of the hepatic triglyceride content, thus being an appropriate gold standard . This methodology is not frequently used in clinical practice since it destroys the tissue and, therefore, it cannot be submitted for histological analysis, meaning that important features, such as inflammation, fibrosis or iron deposition, are not evaluated . Our data showed that the histopathological estimation of steatosis positively correlates with the Folch value, although the correlation value was modest, indicating that the semi-quantitative analysis of steatosis presents Folch variability. All of these data indicate that the Folch method is the appropriate three-dimensional approach to determine the hepatic fat concentration and is the correct gold standard for NAFLD.
We and others ,- have recently reported positive correlations between MRI and Folch in animal models of NAFLD. Thus, we found using experimental (n = 40) and control (n = 10) rat groups that multi-echo MRI strongly correlates with Folch (r2 = 0.87) . There are no available studies in the literature, except for a recent pilot study with 18 adult patients who underwent cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis , that compare the analysis of hepatic steatosis by MRI and the biochemical quantification of triglycerides in human liver biopsies. Our results from a larger cohort of adult patients showed that multi-echo MRI fat fraction strongly correlates with the Folch, resulting in a novel linear regression equation to predict the hepatic triglyceride concentration from multi-echo MRI fat fraction measurements. This formula was afterwards validated in 31 additional patients, showing strong correlation between the measured and estimated Folch values. Thus, obese patients show increased steatosis compared to controls using multi-echo MRI fat fraction and Folch value, and bariatric surgery decreased steatosis in these patients one year after operation. Although the best method to check the accuracy of the developed equation would be the Folch measurement 12 months after surgery, there are ethical problems due to inherent methodological risks. In addition, the MRI-estimated Folch value obtained before bariatric surgery and the weight loss (kg) both positively correlate with the improvement of steatosis one year after operation.
These data strongly suggest that MRI is a valuable diagnostic tool not only to estimate the hepatic lipid concentration, but is also a non-invasive technique to monitor the changes in steatosis occurring in liver tissue. MRI software may automatically generate the fat fraction and, by using our new formula, determine the triglyceride concentration without any inter-observer bias. In addition, multi-echo MRI is a more economic approach than Folch measurement; thus, MRI costs usually are not as much of those resulting from the Folch technique, which include ultrasound-guided liver biopsy and the triglyceride measurement. However, these costs may vary between different hospitals and countries. Overall, this new equation may represent an innovative clinical tool to diagnose and monitor steatosis in patient groups with risk of developing NAFLD, and may also help to discard liver donations of individuals with high fat content.
Our results identify multi-echo MRI as an appropriate non-invasive approach to predict the hepatic lipid concentration using our novel formula. Since multi-echo software is usually available in MRI units, this may represent an economical non-invasive method to diagnose and monitor steatosis in risk groups with obesity and/or metabolic syndrome.
RJ-A designed the study, performed the surgical interventions and obtained the liver biopsies, carried out the statistical analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. JIE designed the study, carried out the statistical analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. AB designed the study, performed the surgical interventions and obtained the liver biopsies, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. LB designed the study, carried out the statistical analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. JMA designed the study, carried out the MRI technique and analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. EG designed the study, carried out the MRI technique and analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. EH designed the study, collected the liver biopsies and the data, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. LG designed the study, performed the surgical interventions and obtained the liver biopsies, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. JS designed the study, carried out the MRI technique and analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. MJP designed the study, carried out the statistical analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. JIA designed the study, performed the surgical interventions and obtained the liver biopsies, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. SL designed the study, performed the surgical interventions and obtained the liver biopsies, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. MG designed the study, performed the histopathological grading of steatosis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. ML designed the study, performed the histopathological grading of steatosis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. MPP designed the study, determined the Folch values, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. LA designed the study, determined the Folch values, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. JMB designed the study, carried out the statistical analysis, discussed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
body mass index
coefficient of variation
field of view
magnetic resonance imaging
1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
region of interest
- Std. Dev:
interval of echo time
Authors thank José Ignacio Martínez y Mari Asunción Zabala for their technical assistance.
This research was supported by grants from: the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (J. M. Banales: FIS PI12/00380, R. Jiménez: FIS PI10/01984), the Spanish Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) (J.M. Banales, L. Bujanda: Ciberehd), and the Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC: J.M. Banales, L. Bujanda); the Department of Industry of the Basque Country (J.M. Banales: SAIO12-PE12BN002); the Health Department of the Basque Country (R. Jimenez: Exp 2010111043); the Department of Education, Universities and Research of the Basque Country (M.P. Portillo: IT-572-13), and the University of the Basque Country (M.P. Portillo: UFI 11/32, ELDUNANOTEK). CIBER-ESP, CIBER-obn, and CIBERehd are funded by the Spanish Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII).
- Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R, Kabacam G, Savas B, Elhan A, Celik A, Bahar K, Karcaaltincaba M: Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology. 2013, 267: 767-775. 10.1148/radiol.13121360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM: Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011, 34: 274-285. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adams LA, Lindor KD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Epidemiol. 2007, 17: 863-869. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.05.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawamitsu H, Kaji Y, Ohara T, Sugimura K: Feasibility of quantitative intrahepatic lipid imaging applied to the magnetic resonance dual gradient echo sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2003, 2: 47-50. 10.2463/mrms.2.47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E, Grimaldi A, Capron F, Poynard T: Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2005, 128: 1898-1906. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Liu YC, Matteoni C, Petrelli M, Goldblum J, Rybicki L, McCullough AJ: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: assessment of variability in pathologic interpretations. Mod Pathol. 1998, 11: 560-565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marsman H, Matsushita T, Dierkhising R, Kremers W, Rosen C, Burgart L, Nyberg SL: Assessment of donor liver steatosis: pathologist or automated software?. Hum Pathol. 2004, 35: 430-435. 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.10.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zaitoun AM, Al Mardini H, Awad S, Ukabam S, Makadisi S, Record CO: Quantitative assessment of fibrosis and steatosis in liver biopsies from patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Pathol. 2001, 54: 461-465. 10.1136/jcp.54.6.461.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Reeder SB, Cruite I, Hamilton G, Sirlin CB: Quantitative assessment of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011, 34: 729-749. 10.1002/jmri.22580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang A, Tan J, Sun M, Hamilton G, Bydder M, Wolfson T, Gamst AC, Middleton M, Brunt EM, Loomba R, Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Sirlin CB: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology. 2013, 267: 422-431. 10.1148/radiol.12120896.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- O’Regan DP, Callaghan MF, Wylezinska-Arridge M, Fitzpatrick J, Naoumova RP, Hajnal JV, Schmitz SA: Liver fat content and T2*: simultaneous measurement by using breath-hold multiecho MR imaging at 3.0 T-feasibility. Radiology. 2008, 247: 550-557. 10.1148/radiol.2472070880.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. 2000, World Health Organization, Geneva
- Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94: 2467-2474. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01377.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH: A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957, 226: 497-509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iverson S, Lang S, Cooper M: Comparison of the Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for total lipid determination in a broad range of marine tissue. Lipids. 2001, 11: 1283-1287. 10.1007/s11745-001-0843-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hijona E, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Alustiza JM, Hijona L, Arenas J, Garcia E, Rojas N, Portillo MP, Jimenez R, Aldazabal P, Bujanda L: Accurate fat fraction quantification by multiecho gradient-recalled-echo magnetic resonance at 1.5 T in rats with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Radiol. 2012, 81: 1122-1127. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SH, Lee JM, Han JK, Lee JY, Lee KH, Han CJ, Jo JY, Yi NJ, Suh KS, Shin KS, Jo SY, Choi BI: Hepatic macrosteatosis: predicting appropriateness of liver donation by using MR imaging-correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2006, 240: 116-129. 10.1148/radiol.2393042218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guiu B, Petit JM, Loffroy R, Ben Salem D, Aho S, Masson D, Hillon P, Krause D, Cercueil JP: Quantification of liver fat content: comparison of triple-echo chemical shift gradient-echo imaging and in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2009, 250: 95-102. 10.1148/radiol.2493080217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yokoo T, Bydder M, Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Gamst AC, Wolfson T, Hassanein T, Patton HM, Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Sirling CB: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2009, 251: 67-76. 10.1148/radiol.2511080666.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Guiu B, Petit JM, Loffroy R, Aho S, Ben Salem D, Masson D, Robin I, Verges B, Hillon P, Cercueil JP, Krausé D: Liver methylene fraction by dual- and triple-echo gradient-echo imaging at 3.0 T: correlation with proton MR spectroscopy and estimation of robustness after SPIO administration. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011, 33: 119-127. 10.1002/jmri.22390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cesbron-Metivier E, Roullier V, Boursier J, Cavaro-Menard C, Lebigot J, Michalak S, Cales P, Aube C: Noninvasive liver steatosis quantification using MRI techniques combined with blood markers. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010, 22: 973-982. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32833775fb.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guaraldi G, Besutti G, Stentarelli C, Zona S, Nocetti L, Loria P, Ballestri S, Losi L, Torricelli P, Ligabue G: Magnetic resonance for quantitative assessment of liver steatosis: a new potential tool to monitor antiretroviral-drug-related toxicities. Antivir Ther. 2012, 17: 965-971. 10.3851/IMP2228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Permutt Z, Le TA, Peterson MR, Seki E, Brenner DA, Sirlin C, Loomba R: Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012, 36: 22-29. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05121.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Iverson SJ, Lang SL, Cooper MH: Comparison of the Bligh and Dyer and Folch methods for total lipid determination in a broad range of marine tissue. Lipids. 2001, 36: 1283-1287. 10.1007/s11745-001-0843-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hines CD, Yu H, Shimakawa A, McKenzie CA, Warner TF, Brittain JH, Reeder SB: Quantification of hepatic steatosis with 3-T MR imaging: validation in ob/ob mice. Radiology. 2010, 254: 119-128. 10.1148/radiol.09090131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korkusuz H, Keese D, Raschidi BA, Hubner F, Namgaladze D, Hintereder G, Hammerstingl R, Korkusuz Y, Monch C, Vogl TJ: Detection of a fatty liver after binge drinking: correlation of MR-spectroscopy, DECT, biochemistry and histology in a rat model. Acad Radiol. 2011, 18: 1349-1357. 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raptis DA, Fischer MA, Graf R, Nanz D, Weber A, Moritz W, Tian Y, Oberkofler CE, Clavien PA: MRI: the new reference standard in quantifying hepatic steatosis?. Gut. 2012, 61: 117-127. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roldan-Valadez E, Favila R, Martinez-Lopez M, Uribe M, Rios C, Mendez-Sanchez N: In vivo 3 T spectroscopic quantification of liver fat content in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: correlation with biochemical method and morphometry. J Hepatol. 2010, 53: 732-737. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.04.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.