From: Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts
Purpose type* | Definition | Methodological rigor |
---|---|---|
Etiology (causation and safety) | Content pertains directly to determining if there is an association between an exposure and a disease or condition. The question is "What causes people to get a disease or condition?" | Observations concerned with the relationship between exposures and putative clinical outcomes; data collection is prospective; clearly identified comparison group(s); blinding of observers of outcome to exposure. |
Prognosis | Content pertains directly to the prediction of the clinical course or the natural history of a disease or condition with the disease or condition existing at the beginning of the study. | Inception cohort of individuals all initially free of the outcome of interest; follow-up of at least 80% of patients until occurrence of a major study end point or to the end of the study; analysis consistent with study design. |
Diagnosis | Content pertains directly to using a tool to arrive at a diagnosis of a disease or condition. | Inclusion of a spectrum of participants; objective diagnostic reference standard OR current clinical standard for diagnosis; participants received both the new test and some form of the diagnostic standard; interpretation of the diagnostic standard without knowledge of test result and vise versa; analysis consistent with study design. |
Treatment | Content pertains directly to an intervention for therapy (including adverse effects studies), prevention, rehabilitation, quality improvement, or continuing medical education. | Random allocation of participants to comparison groups; outcome assessment of at least 80% of those entering the investigation accounted for in 1 major analysis at any given follow-up assessment; analysis consistent with study design. |
Economics | Content pertains directly to the economics of a healthcare issue with the economic question addressed being based on the comparison of alternatives. | Question is a comparison of the alternatives; alternative services or activities compared on outcomes produced (effectiveness) and resources consumed (costs); evidence of effectiveness must from a study of real patients that meets the above-noted criteria for diagnosis, treatment, quality improvement, or a systematic review article; effectiveness and cost estimates based on individual patient data (micro-economics); results presented in terms of the incremental or additional costs and outcomes of one intervention over another; sensitivity analysis if there is uncertainty. |
Clinical prediction guide | Content pertains directly to the prediction of some aspect of a disease or condition. | Guide is generated in one or more sets of real patients (training set); guide is validated in another set of real patients (test set). |