Peer Review reports
From: Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Author responded | Author comments | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Author responded | Author comments | |
Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 11 | |
Author responded | Author comments | |
Resubmission - Version 12 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 12 | |
Author responded | Author comments | |
Resubmission - Version 13 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 13 | |
Publishing | ||
12 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-163 |
You can find further information about peer review here.