Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Schaefer |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donald Phinney |
| 16 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Darwin Prockop |
| 29 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Schaefer |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 29 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Schaefer |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 29 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 3 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Donald Phinney |
| 15 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Schaefer |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 15 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Jun 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-146 |
You can find further information about peer review here.