Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kenneth Remy |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kenneth Remy |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Altmann |
30 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rakesh Bhatnagar |
11 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kenneth Remy |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kenneth Remy |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kenneth Remy |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
2 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rakesh Bhatnagar |
4 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kenneth Remy |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
11 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kenneth Remy |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
11 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
13 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Oct 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-217 |
You can find further information about peer review here.