Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 May 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter de Jonge |
9 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Traolach Brugha |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
2 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Martin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter de Jonge |
3 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Traolach Brugha |
4 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Martin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter de Jonge |
25 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Martin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Martin |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
29 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pascal Meier |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
29 Nov 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-263 |
You can find further information about peer review here.