Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Woolhouse |
26 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giuseppe Ippolito |
31 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ariel Rivas |
3 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mirjam Kretzschmar |
31 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Timo Smieszek |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
20 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Woolhouse |
24 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ariel Rivas |
5 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mirjam Kretzschmar |
12 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giuseppe Ippolito |
24 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Timo Smieszek |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Timo Smieszek |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Timo Smieszek |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
12 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-35 |
You can find further information about peer review here.