Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial

Original Submission
11 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars L Gustafsson
21 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jørund Straand
20 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Celine Buffel du Vaure
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars L Gustafsson
24 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jørund Straand
17 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Celine Buffel du Vaure
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Celine Buffel du Vaure
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
25 Mar 2014 Editorially accepted
28 Apr 2014 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-12-69

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page