Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives

Original Submission
16 Dec 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Guyatt
19 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Shoukri
1 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Peter Bacchetti
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Peter Bacchetti
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Guyatt
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
22 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1741-7015-8-17

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page