Skip to main content

Table 3 The prevalence of distinct failure patterns in the study cohort

From: Sex differences in the morphological failure patterns following hip resurfacing arthroplasty

  

entire study cohort

n = 204

entire study cohort

n = 204

valid data on sex

n = 173

   

unknown sex

n = 31

valid data on sex

n = 173

men

n = 88

women

n = 85

cause for revision

periprosthetic fracture

133

19

114

65

49

 

non-fractural cause

71

12

59

23

36

   

P = 0.683

P = 0.026

periprosthetic fracture

pattern

postnecrotic

biomechanic

73

60

9

10

64

50

41

24

23

26

   

P = 0.619

P = 0.086

osteonecrosis

present

174

23

151

80

71

 

absent

30

8

22

8

14

   

P = 0.093

P = 0.151

extent of osteonecrosis

[mm]

7.4,

6.4,

7.6,

15.3,

6.2,

  

2.9 to

19.5

2.1 to

6.8

3.1 to

21.3

3.6 to

24.2

2.6 to

14.6

   

P = 0.171

P = 0.008

non-fractural causes

Loosening of the

acetabular component

15

1

14

4

10

 

Loosening of the

femoral component

10

3

7

2

5

 

cement-socket

debonding

3

0

3

2

1

 

Collapsed

osteonecrosis

5

2

3

0

3

 

Metallosis

2

1

1

0

1

 

Unexplained

groin pain

36

5

31

14

17

   

P = 0.249

P = 0.417

unexplained

groin pain

excessive lymphocyte

infiltration

14

3

11

1

10

   

P = 0.451

P = 0.021

 

interface hyperosteoidosis

37

7

30

8

22

   

P = 0.457

P = 0.005