Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maarten Postma |
7 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jon Kim Andrus |
17 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shalini Kulasingam |
7 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maarten Postma |
9 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jon Kim Andrus |
17 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shalini Kulasingam |
12 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raymond Hutubessy |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Publishing | ||
12 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-54 |
You can find further information about peer review here.