Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 11 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lucas M. Bachmann |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - carmela cappelli |
| 1 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lars Bjerrum |
| 3 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl Llor |
| 4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Feng Gao |
| 28 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lucas M. Bachmann |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 28 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 1 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - carmela cappelli |
| 6 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl Llor |
| 7 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Feng Gao |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-56 |
You can find further information about peer review here.