Skip to main content

Archived Comments for: Infant EEG activity as a biomarker for autism: a promising approach or a false promise?

Back to article

  1. This needs shouting from the rooftops

    Dorothy Bishop, University of Oxford

    31 May 2011

    The media appear to take only two messages from biomedical research; this will give us a cure for X, or this will help early diagnosis of X. In the case of autism, the researchers often collude with these unrealistic interpretations by their failure to understand basic issues about sensitivity and specificity. See my blog for other examples.
    Further, as Griffin & Westbury point out, this is made worse in the infant sibs literature by a growing tendency to assume ALL sibs of children with autism have subclinical impairments, even though the genetics and family studies indicate otherwise.
    Very glad to see this paper, which deserves wide circulation.

    Competing interests