Skip to main content

Table 5 Overview of extracted descriptive study data for the discipline Music

From: Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines

Reference

First author

Year

Country

Language

Study duration, days

Intervention duration, days

Study design

Study groups

Number of participants

Participants

Gender

Age, years

Body part

Training task

Focus

Measurement events

Results

Study rating

                 

Relative change

Absolute change

 

[127]

Coffman, DD

1990

USA

E

1

1

CCT

8

2

Musicians

Both

Mean = 23, range 18 to 58

Upper limb

Piano-playing performance

M

2 (pre-post-test)

↗

↗

5/10

[128]

Ross, SL

1985

USA

E

1

1

RCT

5

51

Trombonists

Both

Mean = 22, range 18 to 29

Upper limb

Trombone-playing performance

M

2 (pre-post-test)

↗

↗

7/10

[129]

Rubin-Rabson, G

1941

USA

E

168

999

CCT

3

13

Piano teachers

NSt

range 21 to 25

Upper limb

Piano-playing performance, memorising new études

M

3 (during int., post-test)

↗

↗

4/10

[130]

Sonnen-schein, I

1990

DE

G

3

3

CS

N/A

20

Piano players

Both

Mean = 33, range 14 to 51

Upper limb

Piano-playing performance

M

2 (pre-post-test)

N/A

↗

4/11

[131]

Theiler, T

1995

USA

E

1

1

CCT

4

14

Music students: guitar majors, voice majors

NSt.

Range 19 to 29

Upper limb

Guitar-playing + vocal performances

M

2 (pre-post-test)

↗

↗

5/10