Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode

  • Evelyn Bromet1Email author,
  • Laura Helena Andrade2,
  • Irving Hwang3,
  • Nancy A Sampson3,
  • Jordi Alonso4,
  • Giovanni de Girolamo5,
  • Ron de Graaf6,
  • Koen Demyttenaere7,
  • Chiyi Hu8,
  • Noboru Iwata9,
  • Aimee N Karam10,
  • Jagdish Kaur11,
  • Stanislav Kostyuchenko12,
  • Jean-Pierre Lépine13,
  • Daphna Levinson14,
  • Herbert Matschinger15,
  • Maria Elena Medina Mora16,
  • Mark Oakley Browne17,
  • Jose Posada-Villa18,
  • Maria Carmen Viana19,
  • David R Williams20 and
  • Ronald C Kessler3
BMC Medicine20119:90

https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-90

Received: 9 June 2011

Accepted: 26 July 2011

Published: 26 July 2011

Back to article

Archived Comments

  1. Some issues with this study

    15 August 2011

    Anirudh Kumar, CIPM

    As an Indian, I cannot help wondering why Pondicherry was chosen as representative of India at all. The Election commission of India has some sophisticated statisticians who could have helped you with location of a more representative site. Although there is the usual mea culpa lip service of limitations, I find there are too many glaring ones both in methods and interpretation of results. I only scanned the paper so if I misread any, I am sorry but I do not think I did. Here are my reservations:
    1. Your response rate for Pondicherry was a whopping 98.6%, and that is surprising even among the low-middle group which had higher rates of response. One could perhaps reason that in rich countries people have survey, interview and focus group fatigue.
    2. But how do you explain this: you find that low-income families in India are at a higher risk (14 times?) of life-time MDE but you seem to think that high-income individuals are more prone to MDE. In fact, high income individuals seem to come out with lower levels of propensity on many of your measures.
    3. Since I know the context a little bit, I cannot but wonder if the low income group understood the questions and responded candidly after the usual probing, clarifying etc required of interviewers.
    a. Interpretation of what has been clarified.
    b. Do not forget that contemporary Indian culture glorifies melancholia. Take a look at the soaps on Indian TV, a large part of the various Bolly etc-woods output, contemporary writers who routinely put out tragedies. After all, middle aged women to date swoon over a rich fool who dies under a tree penniless and drunk. There is no doubt that other cultures also have their "tragic" characters, but in the contemporary Indian context, it is taken to the extreme. It is more likely to be so with the low-middle income households with less exposure to the cosmopolitan tastes cultivated by the higher income bracket. The upshot is that being depressed becomes something heroicly romantic (both mean the same but to give some emphasis), and pride in being depressed is accentuated. No wonder you found the results.

    4. It would have been useful and more credible if your group reported on the composition of the final sample (usable responses) in terms of demographics particularly for the lower-middle income countries. These cultures are typically conservative with high income brackets do not really like the idea of self-disclosure to a stranger (vulnerability issue) even if s/he flashes a WHO id card. In that case, one has to assume that the sample came from patients or referrals of those who were treated or were visiting the involved investigators in some way or the other. A fuller disclosure would remove these suspicions.

    5. Finally, although Psychiatry- granted it is my opinion- has since risen from the couch for a glass of water and prozac, it still tip-toes that line between pseudo- and hard-science. Interviews and surveys may not be the best way to establish its scientific character.

    I do not doubt that India has its share of depressed people and even manic depressives. However, to conclude or infer about proportions- it might make for a nice publication contributing towards tenure or increment- is erroneous. Since I know the context, I made a few observations however ignorant I might be. I wonder how many others are easily misled by the findings (I came across these findings not because of professional interest but because I found the report in a popular magazine). It is useful to remember what Dr. Ioannides has been reporting on medical science and statistics over the last few years.

    Competing interests

    None, I am not even marginally connected to this field of inquiry.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Putnam Hall - South Campus
(2)
Section of Psychiatric Epidemiology - LIM 23, Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School
(3)
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School
(4)
Health Services Research Unit, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain and CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
(5)
IRCCS Centro S. Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
(6)
Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction
(7)
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Gasthuisberg
(8)
Shenzhen Institute of Mental Health & Shenzhen Kangning Hospital
(9)
Department of Clinical Psychology, Hiroshima International University
(10)
Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, Balamand University Medical School and the Institute for Development, Research, Advocacy and Applied Care (IDRAAC)
(11)
Directorate General of Health Services
(12)
Ukrainian Psychiatric Association
(13)
Hôpital Lariboisière Fernand Widal, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris INSERM U 705, CNRS UMR 7157 University Paris Diderot and Paris Descartes Paris
(14)
Research & Planning, Mental Health Services Ministry of Health
(15)
Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health University of Leipzig
(16)
National Institute of Psychiatry
(17)
The University of Tasmania Statewide and Clinical Director Dept of Health and Human Services New Town
(18)
Instituto Colombiano del Sistema Nervioso
(19)
Section of Psychiatric Epidemiology, Institute of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo
(20)
Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health

Advertisement