Peer Review reports
From: The DSM-5 criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: inclusiveness is safer
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sandeep Grover |
4 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Sampson |
18 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gideon Caplan |
10 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
14 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 Jul 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Davis |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Jul 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
1 Aug 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Sep 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s12916-014-0141-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.