Skip to main content

Archived Comments for: A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials

Back to article

  1. Thanks for this very useful guide

    Oliver Frank, University of Adelaide

    5 February 2016

    The information and advice should be helpful for many who agree to review reports of RCTs.

    Let's hope that in the near future academic institutions recognise that reviewing others' work is a valuable activity that should be formally taken into account when considering tenure, re-appointment and promotion.

    Competing interests

    I declare no competing interests.