Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Are potentially clinically meaningful benefits misinterpreted in cardiovascular randomized trials? A systematic examination of statistical significance, clinical significance, and authors’ conclusions

Original Submission
13 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Werner Vach
22 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Parulekar
23 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gary Allan
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Werner Vach
13 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Parulekar
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
16 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
20 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12916-017-0821-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page