Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework

Original Submission
9 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Trisha Greenhalgh
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Trisha Greenhalgh
9 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marilyn R Lennon
27 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Mickan
19 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gail Mountain
23 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nathan Shippee
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Trisha Greenhalgh
12 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marilyn R Lennon
12 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sharon Mickan
27 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gail Mountain
12 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nathan Shippee
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
14 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12916-018-1050-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\