Peer Review reports
From: Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Jan 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Mar 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathan O'Hara |
| 27 Mar 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Eijkenaar |
| 11 May 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Ankur Pandya |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 May 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 12 Jun 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathan O'Hara |
| 21 Jun 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Eijkenaar |
| 6 Jul 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Ankur Pandya |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Jul 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Jul 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 29 Aug 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12916-018-1126-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.