Skip to main content

Table 2 Frequencies and proportion of women-at-risk participants experiencing traumatic events (N = 104): comparison with Sudanesea (n = 15) and Burmeseb (n = 32) women who arrived through Humanitarian (201) or Refugee (subclass 200) visas

From: Recently resettled refugee women-at-risk in Australia evidence high levels of psychiatric symptoms: individual, trauma and post-migration factors predict outcomes

Item

Trauma event

Women-at-risk

Sudanesea

Burmeseb

n

%

%

%

1

Lack of food or water

66

63.5

73.3

71.9

3

Lack of shelter

61

58.7

66.7

71.9

2

Ill health without access to medical care

56

53.8

26.7

43.8

11

Forced separation from family members

56

53.8

93.3

46.9

10

Being close to death

52

50.0

40.0

37.5

5

Serious injury

50

48.1

20.0

15.6

13

Unnatural death of family or friend

47

45.2

20.0

34.4

16

Torture

46

44.2

26.7

12.5

4

Imprisonment/detention

45

43.3

13.3

12.5

12

Murder of family or friends

43

41.3

80.0

21.9

6

Combat situation

42

40.4

46.7

53.1

15

Lost or kidnapped

42

40.4

13.3

9.4

9

Forced isolation from others

37

35.6

33.3

9.4

8

Rape or sexual abusec

34

33.7

13.3

16.1

14

Murder of stranger or strangers

34

32.7

26.7

15.6

7

Brain washing

25

24.0

13.3

21.9

17

Threatened by dangerous animals

16

15.4

00.0

25.0

  1. aUsing split-group analysis of data from Schweitzer et al. [12]
  2. bUsing split-group analysis of data from Schweitzer et al. [13]
  3. cThree participants chose not to answer this question in the women-at-risk group