Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of best fitting models for shape of change, the impact of study covariates and class descriptions

From: Frailty trajectories to identify end of life: a longitudinal population-based study

Model

Latent growth model: Intercept variance free, slope variance free, quadratic term added

Previous model plus study design covariates age and sex, intercept regressed on age and sex

 

Previous model specified as a latent growth mixture model with three classes

Log likelihood

− 530,331.072

−529,340.060

 

− 519,497.615

Adjusted BIC

1,060,816.13

1,058,848.110

 

1,039,247.203

 

Estimatea

95% CI

Estimatea

95% CI

 

Estimatea

95% CI

Intercept

25.185

(25.048 to 25.322)

25.893

(25.715 to 26.071)

class 1 ‘stable class’ (n = 20,144, 76.6%)

25.959

(25.763 to 26.155)

Slope

0.151

(0.144 to 0.158)

0.151

(0.144 to 0.158)

− 0.080

(− 0.085 to – 0.074)

Quadratic

0.003

(0.003 to 0.004)

0.003

(0.003 to 0.004)

0.015

(0.015 to 0.015)

Age on intercept

0.467

(0.444 to 0.489)

0.466

(0.444 to 0.489)

Sex on intercept

− 1.594

(− 1.864 to – 1.325)

− 1.598

(− 1.866 to – 1.329)

Intercept

    

class 2 ‘moderately increasing class’ (n = 5572, 21.2%)

26.232

(25.907 to 26.558)

Slope

    

0.802

(0.765 to 0.838)

Quadratic

    

− 0.029

(− 0.032 to – 0.027)

Age on intercept

    

0.466

(0.444 to 0.489)

Sex on intercept

     

− 1.598

(− 1.866 to – 1.329)

Intercept

    

class 3 ‘rapidly rising class’ (n = 582, 2.2%)

20.583

(19.387 to 21.779)

Slope

    

2.294

(2.115 to 2.472)

Quadratic mean

    

− 0.102

(− 0.114 to – 0.09)

Age on intercept

    

0.466

(0.444 to 0.489)

Sex on intercept

     

− 1.598

(− 1.866 to – 1.329)

  1. a Models used eFI multiplied by 100 to aid estimation and interpretation. Text in results refers to eFI in original units