Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: ‘Caveat emptor’: the cautionary tale of endocarditis and the potential pitfalls of clinical coding data—an electronic health records study

Original Submission
17 Jan 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
7 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
11 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Casey
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
17 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
3 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Casey
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
24 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12916-019-1390-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\