Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: ‘Caveat emptor’: the cautionary tale of endocarditis and the potential pitfalls of clinical coding data—an electronic health records study

Original Submission
17 Jan 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
11 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Casey
28 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Casey
17 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
19 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Thornhill
9 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Fawcett
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12916-019-1390-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page