Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Original Submission
7 Jun 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Haines
18 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Dunn
4 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Dunn
17 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Haines
19 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - ANTHONY CHAUVIN
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Sep 2019 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page