Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics – quality assessment

From: Drug-resistant enteric fever worldwide, 1990 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study quality characteristics

Number of studies (%)

Study designa

 Clinical trial

16 (4.0)

 Prospective

155 (38.7)

 Retrospective

230 (57.4)

Sample size

 10-29

63 (16.4)

 30-99

137 (35.7)

 >100

184 (47.9)

Method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing

 Disk-diffusion

183 (47.7)

 Disk-diffusion & MIC determination

98 (25.5)

 Microdilution

26 (6.8)

 E-test

9 (2.3)

 Automated methodsb

7 (1.8)

 Multiple MIC determination methods

6 (1.6)

 Not stated

55 (14.3)

Guidelines for antimicrobial susceptibility testingc

 BSAC/EUCAST

11 (2.8)

 CLSI/NCCLS

200 (51.4)

 Other

12 (3.1)

 Not stated

166 (42.7)

Version of antimicrobial susceptibility testing guidelines stated

 Stated

168 (43.8)

 Not stated

216 (56.3)

Internal quality control reported

 Yes

122 (31.8)

 No

262 (68.2)

External quality assessment (EQA) participation reported

 International EQA

5 (1.3)

 National EQA

2 (0.5)

 Results confirmed by national or international surveillance laboratory

23 (6)

 Not stated

354 (92.2)

  1. aOne article combined the report of a retrospective and a prospective study
  2. bAutomated systems include VITEK 2, Phoenix 100 and Rapid ATB tests
  3. cSix studies used the CLSI/NCCS and the BSAC/EUCAST guidelines for different antibiotics so contributed to the numbers twice