Skip to main content

Table 5 Number of apps in each category complying with HONcode principles

From: Suicide prevention and depression apps’ suicide risk assessment and management: a systematic assessment of adherence to clinical guidelines

HONcode principles

DM

(n = 20)

DM and SP

(n = 3)

SP

(n = 46)

Total

(n = 69)

p*

Authoritative: qualifications of the authors are indicated

8 (40%)

2 (67%)

3 (7%)

13 (19%)

<  0.001

Complementarity: information should support, not replace, the doctor-patient relationship

9 (45%)

2 (67%)

19 (41%)

30 (43%)

0.688

Privacy: respect the privacy and confidentiality of personal data submitted by the user

14 (70%)

3 (100%)

27 (59%)

44 (64%)

0.327

Attribution: cite the source(s) of published information, date medical, and health pages

4 (20%)

6 (13%)

10 (14%)

0.675

Justifiability: site must back up claims relating to benefits and performance

8 (40%)

8 (12%)

<  0.001

Transparency: accurate email contact

20 (100%)

3 (100%)

43 (93%)

66 (96%)

0.605

Financial disclosure: identify funding sources

14 (70%)

3 (100%)

34 (74%)

51 (74%)

0.713

Advertising policy: clearly distinguish advertising from editorial content

 

There was no advertisements in the assessed apps

  1. DM depression management, SP suicide prevention; *In italics, statistically significant p values (< 0.05)