Peer Review reports
From: Born to fail: flaws in replication design produce intended results
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carina King |
| 20 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Setel |
| 21 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jamie Perin |
| 20 Dec 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Abraham Flaxman |
| 25 Dec 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carina King |
| 28 Jan 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Abraham Flaxman |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Dec 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Feb 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Mar 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12916-020-01517-w |
You can find further information about peer review here.