Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of evidence credibility assessment of 34 unique meta-analyses of observational studies investigating the associations between risk factors and CRC metastasis

From: Risk factors and risk prediction models for colorectal cancer metastasis and recurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies

Population

Outcome

Risk factor

Risk factor prevalence

Effect size (95% CI)

Evidence classification

Histopathological risk factor

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC

Vascular invasion

330/1731 = 19%

2.73 (1.98–3.78)

Convincing

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC

Lymphatic invasion

906/3347 = 27%

6.78 (5.29–8.69)

Highly suggestive

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC

Tumor budding

2401/10,128 = 24%

6.39 (5.23–7.80)

Highly suggestive

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

Tumor budding

1955/6739 = 29%

4.96 (3.97–6.19)

Highly suggestive

 Rectal cancer

Lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

Tumor size > 1 cm

203/348 = 58%

6.76 (3.25–14.04)

Highly suggestive

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC

Lymphovascular invasion

340/1695 = 20%

4.81 (3.14–7.36)

Suggestive

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC patients who underwent additional surgeries after an endoscopic resection

Lymphovascular invasion

91/313 = 29%

5.29 (2.34–11.98)

Suggestive

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC

Poor differentiation

94/2722 = 4%

5.61 (2.90–10.83)

Suggestive

 Rectal cancer

Lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

Muscularis properia invasion

122/322 = 38%

5.08 (2.32–11.11)

Suggestive

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC

Submucosal invasion ≥ 1 mm

2389/2922 = 82%

2.95 (1.39–6.27)

Weak

 Small rectal NETs

Lymph node metastasis in small rectal NETs treated by local excision

Lymphovascular invasion

104/517 = 20%

5.02 (1.16–21.72)

Weak

 Rectal cancer

Lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

Central depression

32/76 = 42%

3.00 (2.10–4.28)

Weak

 Rectal cancer

Synchronous metastasis in rectal cancer

MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI)

212/804 = 26%

5.65 (2.12–15.05)

Weak

 Small rectal NETs

Lymph node metastasis in small rectal NETs treated by local excision

Lymphatic invasion

73/493 = 15%

5.54 (0.02–1752.46)

No association

 Rectal cancer

Lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

Vascular invasion

46/168 = 27%

5.86 (0.77–44.62)

No association

 Small rectal NETs

Lymph node metastasis in small rectal NETs treated by local excision

Vascular invasion

75/211 = 36%

3.63 (0.05–268.57)

No association

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC patients who underwent additional surgeries after an endoscopic resection

Poor or moderate differentiation

122/209 = 58%

3.77 (1.12–123.16)

No association

Biomarker

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

Downregulated E-cadherin expression

829/1573 = 53%

0.49 (0.34–0.72)

Highly suggestive

 CRC

Hepatic metastasis (distant) in CRC

Circulating tumor cells

103/310 = 33%

6.38 (2.67–15.26)

Suggestive

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

Low MUC2 expression level

613/1335 = 46%

1.42 (1.19–1.69)

Suggestive

 CRC

Distant metastasis in CRC

Downregulated E-cadherin expression

509/1027 = 50%

0.45 (0.23–0.91)

Weak

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

Circulating tumor cells

797/1802 = 44%

1.62 (1.17–2.23)

Weak

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

p16 protein expression

482/800 = 60%

0.50 (0.30–0.84)

Weak

 CRC

Distant metastasis in CRC

Cyclin D1 overexpression

952/1515 = 63%

0.60 (0.36–0.99)

Weak

 CRC

Distant metastasis in CRC

β-catenin overexpression in the nucleus

283/531 = 53%

0.48 (0.29–0.79)

Weak

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

CD147 expression

603/815 = 74%

1.41 (0.39–5.01)

No association

 CRC

Distant metastasis in CRC

CD147 expression

405/538 = 75%

2.32 (1.34E−06 to 4.03E+06)

No association

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

CD133 expression

550/1629 = 34%

1.15 (0.82–1.62)

No association

 CRC

Distant metastasis in CRC

CD133 expression

300/1064 = 28%

1.54 (0.39–6.09)

No association

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

HER-2 immunohistochemical expression

440/1289 = 34%

1.90 (0.90–4.02)

No association

Genetic risk factor

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

BRAF mutation

736/1142 = 64%

0.75 (0.49–1.14)

No association

 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in CRC

RASSF1A promoter methylation

100/184 = 54%

1.61 (0.16–16.16)

No association

 CRC

Distant metastasis in CRC

RASSF1A promoter methylation

153/417 = 37%

2.57 (0.64–10.24)

No association

Demographic risk factor

 pT1 CRC

Lymph node metastasis in pT1 CRC

Female gender

465/1329 = 35%

2.23 (0.78–6.42)

No association

  1. Abbreviation: CI confidence interval, CRC colorectal cancer, NET neuroendocrine tumor