Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of the RESPECT activity program on cardiorespiratory fitness and physical function

From: Effects of a physical activity program from diagnosis on cardiorespiratory fitness in children with cancer: a national non-randomized controlled trial

 

n

Baseline

n

3 months

n

6 months

Group (p)

Time (p)

Change over time between groups per week (mean, 95% CI)

Change over time between groups (p)

VO2peak (mL/kg/min)

 INT

38

27.4 ± 6.97

30

26.1 ± 6.1

34

29.6 ± 6.9

0.2830

0.1415

0.25 [0.07 to 0.43]

0.0062

 CON

13

27.8 ± 8.3

13

23.8 ± 5.9

10

22.1 ± 5.8

 

0.0238

  

Max watt (W)

 INT

38

107.6 ± 33.1

30

95.5 ± 34.9

30

112.6 ± 49.5

0.0438

0.0185

0.21 [0.07 to 0.35]

0.0038

 CON

13

113.1 ± 63.8

13

90 ± 45.1

10

69 ± 27

 

0.0694

  

Sit-to-stand (reps)

 INT

90

25.1 ± 6.4

74

24.2 ± 7.2

81

24.6 ± 8.1

< 0.0001

0.4960

0.04 [− 0.08 to 017]

0.5057

 CON

26

18.0 ± 5.0

38

16.5 ± 6.8

28

17.6 ± 7.3

 

0.8919

  

Timed-up-and-go (s)

 INT

85

4.0 ± 0.8

74

4.3 ± 1.1

82

4.1 ± 1.2

< 0.0001

0.3038

0.02 [− 0.09 to 0.04]*

0.4129

 CON

27

5.5 ± 1.7

38

6.0 ± 1.9

27

6.4 ± 3.3

    

Right handgrip strength (kg)

 INT

103

21.4 ± 11.4

90

19.3 ± 10.5

91

20.1 ± 11.4

0.3418

0.4085

− 0.01 [− 029 to 0.27]

0.9438

 CON

28

17.1 ± 9.7

39

12.1 ± 8.2

30

12.7 ± 8.5

 

0.0711

  

Left handgrip strength (kg)

 INT

104

20.0 ± 10.8

90

17.4 ± 10.2

90

18.5 ± 10.7

0.0032

0.0062

0.01 [−0.002 to 0.02]

0.1668

 CON

28

16.6 ± 10.4

39

10.5 ± 7.6

30

12.0 ± 8.4

 

0.0466

  

Flamingo balance (hits)

 INT

98

0 [0 to 7]

86

0 [0 to 18]

87

0 [0 to 16]

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

 

0.5846

 CON

27

0 [0 to 13]

37

1 [0 to 26]

27

1 [0 to 26]

 

< 0.0001

  
  1. VO2peak, sit-to-stand, timed-up-and-go, and handgrip strength are reported in mean and standard deviation, and flamingo balance is reported in median and range. All analysis is adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis (hematological versus oncological)
  2. INT the intervention group, CON the control group
  3. *The interaction effect in TUG is presented in percentages