Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of matched patients revised and not revised for PJI following primary THR

From: What are the inpatient and day case costs following primary total hip replacement of patients treated for prosthetic joint infection: a matched cohort study using linked data from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics

 

Revised PJI group (n = 422)

Comparator group (n = 1923)

Number (%)

Number (%)

Date of primary—range

16/05/03–02/12/09

28/04/03–01/12/09

Age—mean (range)

66 (21–95)

67 (23–92)

Female

191 (45)

891 (46)

Osteoarthritis diagnosis

398 (94)

1862 (97)

ASA grade

 P1

69 (16)

302 (16)

 P2

298 (71)

1399 (73)

 P3

55 (13)

222 (12)

Charlson

 0

275 (65)

1415 (74)

 1

97 (23)

333 (17)

 2

31 (7)

104 (5)

 3 or above

19 (5)

71 (4)

Procedure

 Cemented

164 (39)

782 (41)

 Uncemented

158 (37)

668 (35)

 Hybrid/reverse hybrid

64 (15)

324 (17)

 Resurfacing

36 (9)

149 (8)

Bearing type

 Metal-on-plastic

254 (60)

1179 (61)

 Metal-on-metal

99 (23)

354 (18)

 Ceramic-on-ceramic

41 (10)

199 (10)

 Ceramic-on-plasticmetal-on-ceramic/ceramic-on-metal

28 (7)

191 (10)

Matches per revised PJI patient

 5 matching comparator patients

358 (85)

  

 4 matching comparator patients

13 (3)

  

 3 matching comparator patients

9 (2)

  

 2 matching comparator patients

12 (3)

  

 1 matching comparator patients

30 (7)

 Â