Skip to main content

Table 3 Combined associations of fast-food outlet exposure and genetic risk score for BMI (BMI-GRS) with risk of obesity in the Fenland Study (n = 10,798), Cambridgeshire, UK, estimated using multinomial logistic regression with a single reference group. Overweight results shown in supplementary materials

From: Independent and combined associations between fast-food outlet exposure and genetic risk for obesity: a population-based, cross-sectional study in the UK

 

Quartiles (Q) of fast-food outlet exposurea

Q1 (n = 4167)

Q2 (n = 1360)

Q3 (n = 3096)

Q4 (n = 2175)

BMI-GRSb

Obese/normal weight (n), % obesec

RR (95% CI)

Obese/normal weight (n), % obesec

RR (95% CI)

Obese/normal weight (n), % obesec

RR (95% CI)

Obese/normal weight (n), % obesec

RR (95% CI)

Low (n = 5399)

392/836, 19.1

REF

122/286, 18.2

1.08d,e (0.83, 1.40)

308/620, 19.9

1.21d,e (0.99, 1.48)

179/555, 16.0

1.73d,e (1.27, 2.35)**

High (n = 5399)

559/682, 26.5

1.84d,e (1.55, 2.19)**

158/247, 22.9

1.54d,e (1.20, 1.98)*

413/493, 26.7

2.20d,e (1.81, 2.68)**

214/416, 20.3

2.70d,e (1.99, 3.66)**

  1. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001
  2. aHome neighbourhood fast-food outlet exposure, quartiles (Q): Q1 (least exposed) = 0–1 outlets; Q2 = 2; Q3 = 3–14; Q4 (most exposed) = 15–51. Quartiles are unequal in sample size due to the distribution of the underlying data
  3. bBMI-GRS, two groups split by sample median: low ≤ 2.29; high > 2.29
  4. cPercent obese as a proportion of all participants, including those normal weight, overweight, and obese
  5. dAdjusts for age, sex, household income, highest educational attainment, car access, smoking status, physical activity energy expenditure, counts of supermarkets in home neighbourhoods
  6. eRRs relative to a single reference group (REF): those least exposed to fast-food outlets (Q1) and at lower BMI-GRS (low)